Foxy,

I'm happy with "not untrue" :) despite the spin you try to put on it :)

But people can make up their own minds by reading the Protector's Letters, on my web-site: www.firstsources.info . and by reading any of the other documents in that web-site, the Annual Reports of the Protector and later the Protection Board from 1837 to 1949, another fifteen hundred pages of data (no doubt distorted by the authors); or any of the transcripts of royal commissions from Victoria, New South Wales, Western Australia and Queensland; or Bleakley's 1929 Report on conditions in the Northern Territory; or any of the hundred other documents on that web-site.

My favourite is the 1935 Moseley Royal Commission transcript of 1000 pages, indexed for readers' convenience. Paul Hasluck, later Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Governor-General, was a reporter for that Moseley Commission, travelling all over the state with the Commissioner. It's on the Western Australia Page of my web-site.

Actually I'm quite chuffed with "not untrue" from Dr Foster :)

Joe

Joe,

You left out the fact that Prof. Foster made it quite
clear that - "Mr Lane's conclusions rather over simplifies
3 otherwise complex phenomena..."

And therefore the way you spin it is not a compliment.

Still chuffed, Foxy :)

Of course, if you read that article, at

https://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=15752

you would be suitably outraged: you could see then how I distorted the evidence to suit my agenda. Or something like that.

Happy reading !

Joe

Joe,

Nah.

I prefer to read Helen Razer's article in the
Daily Review on Stan Grant.

Especially the comment section at the end.

http://dailyreview.com.au/helen-razer-stan-grants-australian-dream/53079/

Yes, I urge readers to read Helen Razer's critique of Stan Grant's 2016 article: The Australian Dream .... , and all of the comments and discussion below it. Fascinating.

Thanks, Foxy.

Loudmouth,

I just read some of the Stan Grant fiction, but I could read no more.
I don't know who this Helen is but boy, what a bitch.
I have to admire you for your patience and tenacity in tolerating and even bothering to respond to this smart arse maggot, Helen Razer.
What a prize neanderthal.
No wonder you can handle the likes of foxy so well, they must be sisters, or maybe foxy is Helen, because the attitude and arrogance are very similar.
They both reckon they are right and everybody else is wrong, they both keep talking in monologue with both saying nothing and both go on and on and on, as I said, and saying nothing.
What is wrong with these idiots, they really suffer from superiority complexes.
As for another wannabee, Stan Grant, another arrogant presumptuous smart arse, daring to call himself a black fella, when he is as white as white.
Well done keep it up, although I don't understand why you bother.
As I have already said, my being on here is to stop the BS from getting too high and start smelling.
Not what some people would like to think that I am for this crappy topic, when in fact I am well against it, unfortunately I have to get on it to denigrate it and those who persist in promoting it and it's false and mis-information.
Joe, I think this might be her weasel of a plan, by continually stoking our fires, she knows we will answer because her comments are so malignant, and so her useless topic keeps accruing pages, and ALL BAD!
I suggest we don't give them any more oxygen and let them stew in their own stench and not bother with responding on this thread any longer.