Paul, I did not suggest I read the book, but that others had, if you care to go back and check.
Based on what others, (plural) said I formed an opinion.
To reach a decision on that opinion and hopefully the truth, I asked the questions, based on the flaws in the book as conveyed to me.
Now I don't give a rats about another book about nothing, only the fact that someone is embellishing and promoting a lie, and it is this I am focused on.
I hope this clarifies things for you.
Now, as it turns out Paul, we have a credible source with questions similar to mine, suddenly appear thanks to Loudmouth.
I therefore take the podium because I have been vindicated, not because of the info, but because someone else, much more qualified and experienced than myself has stepped in to take my place.
Where-as before they came along I was presented as a charlatan for even daring to question Pascoe.
So now I am vindicated and you lot can take your narrow minds and shove em'.
Remember before you try to take me on again, THINK!

ALTRAV,

Nobody is taking you on.

You're being delusional again. You fell for the first
lot of baloney and now you appear to have fallen for
another lot that's been given of all people by the
editor of a right-wing News Corp newspaper - "Cairns
News." "Dark Emu exposed." And you've swallowed it
hook, line and sinker. Take your own advice and
THINK for yourself. These people will do whatever it
takes to demean the Indigenous people in every way
they can.

Foxy,
Come on, really?
Why would any publication intentionally lie or mislead.
This is not some common gutter press, I imagine they must be in possession of information which is credible enough to challenge Pascoe and his book.
You do realise they can be dragged through the courts for challenging someone implying they are lying or made it up.
Well if your right we will be seeing some interesting developments on the matter.

"Why would any publication intentionally lie or mislead"

I wont mention the obvious book that was full of delusional lies. Try Erich von Daniken's 'Chariots of the Gods'. Erich did stretch the truth a little, but you had to read the book to form your own opinion.

ALTRAV your opinion of Aboriginal people is well known on the Forum, anything that paints them in a positive light is going to be denigrated by you. Your prejudistic opinion is worthless since it is formulated on preconceived negative beliefs.

BTW Keep "imagining", you said it yourself, it suits you.

Foxy & Paul,

Apart from all that, is what that site maintains, accurate or not ? Does it fabricate quotes from Mitchell, etc. or - as it points out - is it Pascoe who fabricates and misquotes to suit his agenda ?

After all, everything that the 'Dark Emu Exposed' site can be checked, just as - it appears - its authors have checked Pascoe's claims and found them fraudulent, that Pascoe is a liar, a fraud, a fake, a mongrel. Couldn't happen to a nicer bloke :)

Joe

Well Joe, is the bottom line of your last post contained in this website you are so fond of. Mr Pascoe is a private citizen, and using such derogatory language is ground for court action.