The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Folau and GoFundMe

Folau and GoFundMe

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 43
  7. 44
  8. 45
  9. Page 46
  10. 47
  11. 48
  12. 49
  13. ...
  14. 52
  15. 53
  16. 54
  17. All
Wrong, wrong, wrong, yet again.
I remember someone saying, 'if you keep repeating a lie again and again, eventually the plebs will believe it'.
Well I'm here to ensure that does not happen.
I would again berate those who keep promoting a lie that Folau breached his employment obligation.
He did not!
How many times do I have to say it, he did not sign the clause in question because the maggot in charge, stuffed it up by not including it in the contract and then realising what a useless excuse for person/manager she is, tried to get him to sign it later, tough.
His manager advised against it thereby leaving the way clear for him to make the comments he did, and as he did not direct those comments at any individual, but broadly at queers and fornicators and so on and so forth, he is guilty of NOTHING!
The only guilty parties, yes parties, are the maggot in charge of the NRL, the shining example of women in top level jobs, HAH!
And that irritating little queer who thinks himself about three times more important or relevant than most other nobodies around him.
THEY are guilty of 'real' crimes possibly against the relevant state and federal and industrial laws.
I truly hope the useless and the arrogant get reamed well and truly.
People who keep pushing their own agenda which goes against all the known evidence, are being seen as fools and slowly losing their credibility and gathering more and more angst from fellow commentors.
I would as a matter of urgency, reconsider the stance as it is losing them a lot of followers and readers.
STOP LYING!
Posted by ALTRAV, Sunday, 7 July 2019 2:27:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"How many times do I have to say it, he did not sign the clause in question because the maggot in charge, stuffed it up by not including it in the contract and then realising what a useless excuse for person/manager she is, tried to get him to sign it later, tough."

Aha, that's gold. RA don't have a leg to stand on then.
It's good if these corporations who dictate to others get some of their own back.
I'm not keen on the religious denominations thinking they can preach their stuff wherever and whenever they want without restrictions though.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Sunday, 7 July 2019 5:28:29 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ALTRAV as you know my view of you has not changed but this needs saying
See I do not read anything you post
But glimpsed your latest terminological inexactitude[lie] and read part of that toxic junk
Your self confidence is badly misplaced
He was warned and broke an agreement
Posted by Belly, Sunday, 7 July 2019 7:13:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The 2 points are Belly,

1). the agreement was never really put in place.
And
2). that RA has no right to put in their contracts, restrictions on what a person says or believes when they are off the field, and off the clock.

These two point are what all of ya are missing when you are defending RA's stance both against freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. In a nut shell they are wrong wrong wrong.
Posted by Not_Now.Soon, Sunday, 7 July 2019 7:57:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Not_Now.Soon,

Thank you, thank you, thank you.
It's encouraging to see that there are people out there who are still objective and talk straight and not with some misguided ideas and views.
As OLOens' should already know, I hate sports, of any kind, or more precisely, the people who 'play' sports.
The reason being they are ALL mentally deficient, some more than others.
You see the whole concept of 'sports' is in fact the domain of children.
It is what children do, naturally, and therefore is an activity reserved exclusively for children.
It forms part of a, specifically, males lifestyle as he grows through his teens.
Once beyond the 'teens' his body is no longer that of a child and therefore cannot handle the extreme physical abuse and/or demands required to play 'sports'.
If it were not for the immature mindset of the sports following public, the body is telling us, I am right.
Just look at the amount of players with injuries.
HEY IDIOTS, the body is telling you, you're too old for this, leave it to the kids.
It's no different than an older guy going to a school prom to 'pull some chicks', they are mentally ill and should not be there, in fact they will be arrested and charged.
I say this to explain I am not backing Folau because I'm one of these sports fanatics/idiots, but because this whole saga and especially those directing blame/fault at Folau, are wrong and are lying about who is to blame and refuse to accept who the real culprits are.
Also the reason I use words like 'maggot' and 'queer' in describing these two 'wrongens', is that these words convey the sentiment or description of these people best.
I cannot speak mildly or kindly when describing or discussing, 'bad' people.
They MUST be held to account or they will never be shown up for what they are, and that they are not only, 'unworthy' people, but unworthy of the station they hold.
Posted by ALTRAV, Sunday, 7 July 2019 10:25:05 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It has been explained numerous times both in the
media, in TV interviews, and in "The Roar," the
sports website that Rugby Australia's player
code and contract - is typical of that of many
businesses.

It requires players to treat everyone equally and with
dignity, regardless of their sexual orientation: not to
use social media to breach expected standards of
behaviour: and not to make public comments or otherwise
clearly act contrary to the best interests of the
game.

Clearly Folau's actions breached the player code of
conduct that was in the contract he initially signed and
one that he agreed to abide by.

The law is clear in this matter - and a Tribunal found
him guilty.

Now it's up to the courts.
Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 7 July 2019 11:30:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 43
  7. 44
  8. 45
  9. Page 46
  10. 47
  11. 48
  12. 49
  13. ...
  14. 52
  15. 53
  16. 54
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy