The Forum > General Discussion > Man made or not it is changing
Man made or not it is changing
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Page 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
-
- All
Posted by SteeleRedux, Friday, 18 January 2019 10:04:48 AM
| |
Belly,
There is an air con unit (window type) that is surplus to my needs now I bought a new unit (quiet) that you can have free if you want. It works well and I replaced it because the fan is a bit noisy. Was intending to put it out on gutter with sign saying 'free' but if you want it I will keep for you. I don't like to toss stuff if someone can make use of it. I'm about 3 hrs North of Brisbane. Posted by HenryL, Friday, 18 January 2019 10:59:02 AM
| |
HENRY YOU BLOKE ARE A CHAMPION
Thanks but far too far away,7 hours to border and I am a lead foot. As another side step from thread, it is even hotter here today Got an hour in before 5am, in garden but then put every fan on sat in middle and still too hot Us oldys, some will know, have our nanny naps with our eyes wide open Put breaky on, in deep fryer Forgot! drove for half an hour to get more timber for garden bed Then remembered Roasted the deep fryer Just glad all else is ok Winter, will get just what you offered, by then the piggy bank will pay for it bloke you are a gem give it to some one closer noise? sounds like a helicopter here now 35 in house 41 out side 12.06 pm Posted by Belly, Friday, 18 January 2019 11:09:48 AM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/weather/australian-temperature-record-broken-twice-in-one-night-20190118-p50s69.html
More progressive lefty fraud? read it at least Posted by Belly, Friday, 18 January 2019 1:42:03 PM
| |
SteeleRedux Quote "He doesn't like you all that much."
** I never would have guessed. ** I am not the only one who often does not understand him. Posted by Philip S, Friday, 18 January 2019 10:28:19 PM
| |
Just to add a bit of confusion.
Why Antarctica’s sea ice cover is so low (and no, it’s not just about climate change) Sea ice cover in Antarctica shrank rapidly to a record low in late 2016 and has remained well below average. But what’s behind this dramatic melting and low ice cover since? Our two articles published earlier this month suggest that a combination of natural variability in the atmosphere and ocean were to blame, though human-induced climate change may also play a role. What happened to Antarctic sea ice in 2016? Antarctic sea ice is frozen seawater, usually less than a few metres thick. It differs from ice shelves, which are formed by glaciers, float in the sea, and are up to a kilometre thick. Sea ice cover in Antarctica is crucial to the global climate and marine ecosystems and satellites have been monitoring it since the late 1970s. In contrast to the Arctic, sea ice around Antarctica had been slowly expanding However, in late 2016 Antarctic sea ice dramatically and rapidly melted reaching a record low. This piqued the interest of climate scientists because such large, unexpected and rapid changes are rare. Sea ice coverage is still well below average now. We wanted to know what caused this unprecedented decline of Antarctic sea ice and what changes in the system have sustained those declines. We also wanted to know if this was a temporary shift or the beginning of a longer-term decline, as predicted by climate models. Finally, we wanted to know whether human-induced climate change contributed to these record lows. REST of article. http://theconversation.com/why-antarcticas-sea-ice-cover-is-so-low-and-no-its-not-just-about-climate-change-109572 Posted by Philip S, Friday, 18 January 2019 11:12:52 PM
|
You wrote;
** I need you to translate that gobbledygook into English. **
He doesn't like you all that much.
Dear mhaze,
Mate that balloon got popped years ago and you are still hanging on to it like grim death. Please show me a single reputable climate scientist who believes there was a “hiatus in temperatures that occurred in two decades up to 2013”.
I'm not sure what you see in the NZ data but are you really saying it supports Hasbeen's contention, one that you tried to defend, that “CO2 displaces water vapour from the atmosphere. As water vapour is a much more efficient greenhouse gas than CO2 it actually reduces green house effect.”?
I think not.