SteeleRedux While you are admitting your mistakes still one to be addressed

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=8614&page=0#274647

Philip S.

Please don't pile on here. Its rare that people in OLO admit error and it needs to be encouraged and lauded. Piling on is the opposite of that.

Belly,

"Consider a truth, every poll worth looking at, in the last five years, shows more want action on climate change than not"

Perhaps. But this is an issue of fact not popularity. I get that you are desperate to check the polls because you'd hate to find out that you're in the minority. A fate worse than death for our Belly.

The problem is that when polled, people usually go with the feel-good response. But paying for it? That's another issue. Its OK if someone else pays for it or someone else suffers job losses. But when it affects them, then sudden their desire for " action on climate change " evaporates.

France is being torn apart because the government decided to make people pay for their climate fantasies.

Gillard/Brown believed the polls that people wanted " action on climate change". But when people realised that had to pay for their beloved " action on climate change" they suddenly decided it wasn't all that urgent after all.

Belly, believe the polls because that's all you've got. But they are leading you down, what is for you, a well-worn garden path.

"Vote will be lost, even dead set Liberals and Nationals,will vote against their party
Vote will be lost, because this government serves other than its citizens
Tell me that is not true"

I would tell you its not true...if I had the faintest idea what you were talking about.

mhaze F again
only in your lonely mind can poll after poll not be true
look, just thinking, rather than put your inability to think on display time and again try cut and past
Say FOX news?
they have opinions nearly as weird as yours
What do you gain out of your childlike charges
man made or not it is changing

mhaze Respectfully I will not take your suggestion, people need to be held to account for what they say in regards to facts especially if it is wrong.

If not called out how long would it be before a lot more people were doing it.

If he has no regard for his credibility, by not answering that's his problem.

He was called out not for an opinion but for trying to introduce false facts into a discussion.

Philip S,

I don't mind you continuing your discussion and disagreement. To tell the truth, I haven't really followed it so can't judge error or not.

But I'd prefer that you not piggy-back on another issue. That one is over and SR acted honourably. I think it should be left at that.

Belly,

I give up on you. You can't follow a logical argument. I agree that the polls probably rightfully show people's opinions in a narrow sense and you then assert that I think the polls are wrong.

In regards to you I'm going to take Mark Twain's advice...

“Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”

mhaze Quote "But I'd prefer that you not piggy-back on another issue. That one is over and SR acted honourably. I think it should be left at that."

** Rubbish **
Posted by SteeleRedux, Sunday, 20 January 2019 7:50:57 PM
"Mate, those who make up the largest proportion of the gang issue in Melbourne are South Sudanese and are Christian for goodness sake."

** He made one comment on the thread which part of is above, so how on earth do you rationalize that he acted honorably. **

The statement is false in at least 3 ways.
1st The police do not ask what religion the person is when booking them, so where do you get your information?
2nd Your statement just defies reality, it would be like saying that all Italians are Catholic, ludicrous.
3rd Even if some of the parents are it does not automatically make the children the same.

mhaze You also state "To tell the truth, I haven't really followed it so can't judge error or not."

** Just how can you make the statement "SR acted honourably." taking into account your above statement? **