The Forum > General Discussion > Someone Had to Say It !
Someone Had to Say It !
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Page 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- ...
- 27
- 28
- 29
-
- All
Posted by mhaze, Sunday, 19 August 2018 7:47:54 AM
| |
Foxy,
“ you charming old coot!” Adjectivally you’re half right. But I’m not old. “will it stop you from nit-picking” Yes I see. You offer up utter unresearched rubbish as evidence for your prejudices and that’s ‘objective’. I show that your utter unresearched rubbish is rubbish and that’s nit-picking Posted by mhaze, Sunday, 19 August 2018 7:49:20 AM
| |
mhaze,
You are so far off the mark on this one. You haven't proven anything. The comments were made by Fraser Anning regarding the Bourke St incident - and News Corp attributed the comments to his speech which I quoted as they appeared in several newspapers. However it appears that he made those comments on 3AW in his interview with Neil Mitchell. BTW - you need to be a bit more selective in who you choose to defend. Prior to his speech - nobody had even heard of Fraser Fanning. Now people can't stop talking about him. Apparently he was instructed (according to "The Insiders" program - to deliberately be "controversial." So that he could garner publicity to be re-elected. To make himself "known." He's certainly achieved the publicity. I could not understand how a man who only got 19 votes (only 19 people voted for him) how this bloke managed to secure a $200,000 job. There must be something dreadfully wrong with our electoral system. Have a read of the following link from News Corp - about where this bloke's real allegiances lie - as well as the other perks that he'll be getting for the next three and a half years. And then tell us why he deserves to be where he is and voice an opinion. Perhaps as the link points out - he needs to getting elected first. http://www.news.com.au/national/politics/19-people-got-this-bloke-a-200k-job/news-story/f8d8aaa83f0c2bcab53626455a3698d6 If you're not "old" how can you explain your behaviour? Ah well, perhaps some people are not "old" in age - but are in behaviour. I understand. My three-year old grandaughter is an "old" soul. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 19 August 2018 12:04:15 PM
| |
What a lucky man Senator Anning is. All this over the top ratbag screaming by the left has lifted his profile from "who" to the bloke with the right idea.
No longer one of Keating's unrepresentative swill, but a man with strong opinions & the guts to shout them to all. The rubbish feigned shock of the left rabble, picking only 2 words of a speech to focus on must have lifted this blokes chance of being re-elected by a factor of about 90%. They have turned a speech that less than one in 10,000 would have even known had happened into an item on news broadcasts. Suddenly he is no longer "WHO" but the bloke who wants to fix our ridiculous immigration levels. Amazing, the left have actually done something useful for the first time in a decade, & now wish they hadn't. Posted by Hasbeen, Sunday, 19 August 2018 12:09:33 PM
| |
Dear Hassie,
Not sure what the "Left" have to do with anything. He's caused the controversy with the help of his speech writer - all by himself. The trick for him now is going to be to get re-elected. 19 voters don't a majority make. Read the link I gave. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 19 August 2018 1:07:13 PM
| |
Hasbeen,
I agree. The Hansonites have found themselves an alternative (Pauline started jabbering about Goebbels because she didn't 'get it' either), and Katter has become more animated. No use to me in SA, but the speech might finally embolden others to speak their minds now that that have seen that the loony Left can't do a thing about Anning except, as you say, raise his profile. It looks as though the usual OLO combatants are going to continue thinking they can win arguments or convince someone to change their mind, but Fraser Anning has said all there is to be said, and we can sit back and enjoy. Posted by ttbn, Sunday, 19 August 2018 1:20:01 PM
|
Yes I get that you are triggered by this phrase ('final solution') and perhaps the Senator should have issued trigger-warnings for all those snowflakes who are traumatised by innocuous words. But the man has said that he had no intention to reference the Holocaust when he put those two words together. And bear in mind that his ‘final solution’ was a vote. He wasn’t calling for the government to start stockpiling cattle cars.
Sorry, but its confected outrage to try to howl the man into silence. Good to see it didn’t work. There’s hope yet.
“fancy words and clever jibes, witty though they may be”…well half of them anyway.