Oh well Senator Anning said it !
The phrase Final Solution would not have been uttered by Hitler.
He probably said "Endlosung !".
Surely those two words together can never ever be used together again ?

But that is a side issue. More to the point is that there are a number
of countries, Britain, Holland, Belgium, Sweden and Germany who would
wish they had said STOP a few years back.
Notice how those countries politics are being turned on their heads.

The political upheaval in Europe is a direct result of Muslim immigration.
Now for the compulsory denial;
Of course all muslims are not terrorists !

Now having got the formalities out of the way;
The real problem is that their religion demands that they do not mix
with nonbelievers. They are forbidden to marry out of their religion
both by the religion and the families. Much like catholics once did.
Surveys in Europe have shown that quite high numbers of muslims will
obey Allah and given the opportunity will kill non believers.
These are not just dreampt up figures but real surveys by semi
government bodies and security organisations.

The problem is nobody can tell you which muslims will act on their
beliefs. All that we know is by example they will.
It is a bit like the air bags in the steering wheels of your car.
We do not know which one will kill you, so we are changing them all.

Make no mistake, we are just one large terrorist act away from
having our politics turned on its head.
What will you say if another 88 Australians are murdered ?

Bazz far more than 88 of us will die at the hands of that primitive section of Islam you target, bank on it, but know Fraser Anning did not speak for me, he did not speak for our parliament, or the majority of us, 19 votes, he got 19 votes for himself,then jumped to another party, we empowered his rant, by keeping the chook house we call senate.
YES ISLAMIC terrorism is primitive and barbaric, nothing you can say will change the fact they, half witted half human, kill more Muslim than us,, nothing will change a truth the Muslim community it by far the biggest contributor in giving our security warnings about terrorists
please consider *should we ban Catholics? because of some being paedophiles?*

Belly, interesting question you pose;
"please consider *should we ban Catholics? because of some being paedophiles?*"

Report this morning; some hundreds of catholic priests in one US state
accused of pedophilia.
Perhaps their training and selection system should be dismantled.
Similar problem with Islam;
The boys are like scattered pearls. (Koran).

Very nasty subject.

//Surveys in Europe have shown that quite high numbers of muslims will
obey Allah and given the opportunity will kill non believers.
These are not just dreampt up figures but real surveys by semi
government bodies and security organisations.//

Yeah, you can tell they're real surveys and not a fairy tale Bazz has just plucked from his fundament by the lack of numerical data. Proper surveys don't contain quantified information, they rely on vague and subjective phrases like 'quite high numbers', 'a small handful', 'more than you can poke a stick at' and 'sweet FA'.

Surveys with statistics in them aren't proper surveys at all, they're an invention to deliberately confuse the likes of Bazz and others who are remarkably so thick they struggle with the concept of percentages (I know, right? I don't get how anybody could be that crap at maths either).

//please consider *should we ban Catholics? because of some being paedophiles?*//

Yes, why don't we ban the Catholic clergy?

Of course not all Catholic priests rape children.

But surveys the world over have shown that very high numbers of Catholic priests will, given the opportunity, rape children. And the Catholic Church has demonstrated through its action over and over again that it doesn't think child rape is a very serious crime. Offenders go unpunished, or just receive a slap on the wrist; church officials with knowledge of child rape fail to report it; they believe they should be entitled to incredibly weak sentences when they do get caught out; etc.

The problem is nobody will tell which Catholic clergy will act on these beliefs. All we know is that some will. Get a large enough group of Catholic priests, and at least one of them will be raping children, and a good deal more will be actively shielding the rapists from any consequences of their actions. Is that a risk we can really afford to take?

What will you say if another 8 year-old is raped?

Reading the transcript of the Frazer Anning speech most of it was fairly standard stuff even the sentence mentioning "final solution"- "The final solution to the immigration problem is, of course, a popular vote." He has used variations of the word "final" six times in his speech. I can't really see what the left is talking about with the focus on "final solution" being a window into Fraser Anning's soul. Appears to be a left beat-up.

The more controversial aspect to his speech is probably his concern about Muslim Immigration.

Good on Anning. 84% of Australians are against multiculturalism. Anning speaks for the majority. The minority, including most deadbeat politicians, are carrying on like wild dogs because this man is mere!y saying what most of us think. The barkers and snappers do not believe in freedom of speech.

We should have maintained the white Australia policy. If people of different races were meant to be living together, it would have been that way since the year dot. All cultures are not equal, and they were never mean to be bundled together; it's a basic law of nature.

On the 'final solution': A silly comment that Anning should have known was going to have the barkers up in arms (although most of them are anti-Semites themselves), Hitler was advised on the solution by the grand mufti of Jerusalem. Hitler hated Christianity, but he admired Islam.