It would also be nice to see a few courses run for young girls on common sense Foxy but I suppose that would not fit the narrative of girls taken any responsibility for actions.

To Foxy.

I understand the insult you're replying to regarding ttbn's take on women activists. But on the other hand, do take it for the merit that it gives. And by example of it's merit take note of your comments in Big Nana's topic of "Changing Human Behavior."

The criticism that women activist's power "ultimately lies in being able to make a scene to get their way, safe in the knowledge that gentlemen are obliged to back away in such circumstances," that criticism has merit. In defense of the political parade of a tragic death your view (in Changing Human Behavior) has this quote:

"We need to call it out - no matter who's doing it - If we don't call it out - who will?"

Your position to spread the word on an issue is the same as the observation of "making a big scene to get their way."

It's a worth while criticism for a common behavior among women activists. Something to think about I hope.

Runner, 'beware the plot within'.
Apparently now it's only the feminists who like males with no norads, and who condemn men.
They apparently don't want to be the same as men.
Well that's alrighty then.
I feel a lot better now because they're not equal to men, it's the neuters they feel equal to.
Because the neuters and the females have finally got one thing in common at least.
They look pretty similar and they are both missing the one (or two) thing/s that definitely would make them the same; norads!
I am finally pleased to see we agree on some things, namely that MEN marry WOMEN, and have children.
It makes me feel so warm and fuzzy to see this sentiment being mentioned.
If we cherry pick we might find the 'odd' reference to women exceeding men.
The problem is it is such a minority, it does not count, whether here or Sweden or Norway.
As far as physicality goes, the weakest of males, more commonly referred to as, neuters, will still hold there own till the female with all her lesser muscles weaken, because it IS a fact that females can train as much as they like but do not have the stamina or the ability to last.
Have you noticed how in every physical endeavour/sport, the females times 'in play' are much shorter than the men's.
Their expectations are incongruous with the truth and that is the reality of it.
The bottom line for feminists is that they are trying to escape the 'mould'.
But the reality is, there are too many facts of nature which absolutely forbid it.
I was not going to say it because I thought it has been made clear, but staunch feminists need to have it in grained in their heads over and over, to the point of ad nauseam.
As for the difference between males and females, men and women.
Of course there are.
They are abundant and historical for anyone to see clearly.
That's if you are looking or really want to see, it, or the truth.

Runner- Do you have children? What are they like? I realise this is a bit personal, but I'm genuinely interested.

runner,

There are courses for girls as well.

Thank You for your concern.

Dear NNS,

On the other side of the coin we have insecure men
who as Yuyutsu has pointed out in this discussion -
are grotesque caricatures. Insecure men who can't
handle the opinions of women and who get defensive
and attack those opinions - they simply aren't worth
the time and effort.

They probably live with their mammas, scratching
their asses and lacking vitamin D.

Those men will never change - and talking to them is
about as effective as a fart in a blizzard.

However, in the real world - unless we change our culture -
nothing will change. And by that I mean - men have to be
a part of this change - blaming the women only - is not
going to bring changes. We can't keep on doing what we're
currently doing, and expect things to change. If we keep
doing what we're doing - we'll keep getting what we've got.