"Their grandparents were employed at Buckingham Palace, he was a groom and she was a maid.
Suddenly they decided to get married and emigrate to Australia,
Their eldest son was born not long after their arrival and the older he got the more he looked like King Edward VII"

Sounds like another "Downton Abbey"

So is it being proposed that there is an 'illegitimate heir' currently living in Australia, or are we just getting to know each other better?

Dear ilmessagio,

Nothing of the kind is being proposed.

Is Mise did say it was a distand relative.

Read about the order of succession in the UK if you're
concerned.

As far as getting to know each other better?

Some people we just may want to give it a miss.

Varrei aver sentito il tuo messaggio.

Before I leave for this evening I would
like to Thank everyone who has contributed
to this discussion. It is appreciated.
However I do feel that it has run its course.
So I shall leave it there.
Have an enjoyable evening.

This man was a relative of Is Mise who may be related to me.

"Michael Edward Abney-Hastings, 14th Earl of Loudoun (22 July 1942 – 30 June 2012) was a British-Australian farmer, who is most noted because of the documentary Britain's Real Monarch, which alleged he was the rightful monarch of England instead of Queen Elizabeth II.

He was born in England and educated at Ampleforth College in Yorkshire, but emigrated to Jerilderie, New South Wales as a teen, where he was a rice farmer and family man. He was the heir-general of George Plantagenet, the younger brother of Edward IV of England. If Edward IV had been illegitimate and the crown of England had descended by male-preference primogeniture before 1500, then George (and his heirs) would have been monarchs of England.

Abney-Hastings died on 30 June 2012 in New South Wales.

In 2004, Britain's Real Monarch, a documentary broadcast on Channel 4 in the United Kingdom repeated the claim that Abney-Hastings, as the senior descendant of George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence, is the rightful King of England. This argument involves two disputed claims: first that Edward IV of England was illegitimate, based on the accusation that his supposed father, Richard, Duke of York, was absent at the time when Edward is thought to have been conceived; and second that the Plantagenet crown should have descended by male-preference cognatic primogeniture instead of agnatic primogeniture and conquest. Also, Henry VI had placed an attainder on Edward after he was restored to the throne, and named George, Duke of Clarence, as heir to the throne after Henry VI and his legitimate issue."

Dear Nick,

Thanks for that.

However, for me this discussion has now run its
course.

I have decided to move on.