The Forum > General Discussion > Failure of the Gun Laws
Failure of the Gun Laws
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Page 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- ...
- 58
- 59
- 60
-
- All
Posted by leoj, Friday, 7 July 2017 5:33:04 PM
| |
The ducking and weaving of the Yank-led gun freaks is in tinfoil hat territory. The issue is not about gut feeling and it's sure as hell not about selfish wants. Posts like " That last link is one of the best jokes so far, it is full of inaccuracies and downright lack of knowledge" - no facts, no reasoning - no more than "The Yank NRA has spoken - you iggo underlings must just accept it"
The big facts are Japan virtually no gun deaths, America tens of thousands. The Yank NRA is an enemy of the Australian people and also the American people and conversations with the enemy are like asking North Korea "pretty please". To put a stop to the public enemy the conversation has to be with the public through public institutions including political parties. That's where my own and my mates' focus is. Posted by EmperorJulian, Friday, 7 July 2017 5:56:05 PM
| |
Emperor Julian,
Been through that a number of times. Your memory is failing you. For example, leoj, Monday, 3 July 2017 10:48:19 PM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=7818&page=31 To be helpful again since you are forgetful, there are substantial social differences. When the triple disaster hit Japan, you did not see civil strife, rioting and looting. People lined up patiently to receive their food supplies and helped one another wherever possible. It should be obvious to you that the US has a multiple of Japan's population, a vastly different social culture, individualism and freedom and it is highly multicultural. Of those, the influence of a multicultural society must rank as a significant feature, if only because the gun crime you are talking about is far more prevalent among lower socio-economic blacks and features gang membership and drugs. The other stuff you go on with is better left alone. Please tell me that you are in the habit of having a few too many. Posted by leoj, Friday, 7 July 2017 6:27:30 PM
| |
Dear Is Mise,
Perhaps the following link may be more "accurate" for you: http://www.theage.com.au/interactive/2016/gun-city/day1.html Posted by Foxy, Friday, 7 July 2017 6:50:01 PM
| |
leoj,
The following link may help clarify who Rebecca Peters is and why it makes sense to present her views in this discussion. She knows what she's talking about and has received awards to prove it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Peters As for the rest of your advice to me? I'm sorry I didn't realize that you're an expert on how I should post (and what I should write?). Please continue while I take notes. On the other hand - I can only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look good either. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 7 July 2017 7:13:50 PM
| |
cont'd ...
leoj, You neglected to mention that the link I cited was not only by Rebecca Peters but it also had input from Prof. of Criminology at the University of New South Wales, Prof. Chris Cunneen. You had earlier disclaimed one of my other links because the author was not an expert in criminology. Are you disputing the information given in this link by a Professor of Criminology? Posted by Foxy, Friday, 7 July 2017 7:45:50 PM
|
Would that be 'THE' Rebecca Peters who is alleged to be long term involved with Soros' Open Society?
Rather than require all to re-visit their posts for you, why don't you do the polite, respectful and good mannered thing and read through and familiarise yourself with all of the posts that have gone before?