Relationship to the Yank NRA has been fully declared in the gun freaks' own posts. At this stage they can do their own research over their own posts.

Issy, what about that Czech law where everyone carries a gun, just in case of an emergency, like slow service at Macca's, being over charged at Woolies, too many people on the bus (I want a seat) etc etc.

America has similar Dodge City gun laws, when is the gun freak in the senate going to introduce such a bill.

Can you shed some light on how you see it working in Aussie? Other than the examples I have given.

Julian,

"Relationship to the Yank NRA has been fully declared in the gun freaks' own posts. At this stage they can do their own research over their own posts."

In plain English, you just don't have any proof of the non-existant fairy tales that you post.

If something looks like a duck, walks like a duck, flies like a duck, quacks like a duck, tastes like a duck, hangs out with ducks, it's a duck.

A bit more about the city of Chicago and gun violence.

Michael W. Austin writing in "Psychology Today,"
February 25, 2014 states that "It is true that Chicago,
a city which has very strict gun laws, also has a
high level of gun violence. However, the case of Chicago
does not support the claim that restrictive gun laws are
ineffective."

"Instead, it shows the need for more widespread laws. People
who want guns can simply go outside of Chicago, obtain them
with ease, and bring them back into the city."

"Consider the fact that between 2008 and 2012 Chicago police
recovered 1,375 guns that were used in criminal activities.
Almost 20% of these guns came from a single store "Chuck's
Gun Shop," located a few miles outside of the Chicago City
limits in Riversdale, Illinois."

"Strict gun laws in one city will be ineffective if the laws
of the state in which that city is located are lax,
as is the case in Illinois."

Here is the full link:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/ethics-everyone/201402/we-need-stricter-gun-laws

Foxy,

Is this the same Michael W, Austen, 'Cultivating Character in Christ' as he would have it?

http://www.michaelwaustin.com/

It is just that I cannot find any relevant skills he might have to claim any authority of criminology.

So his opinion is not worth any more than someone riding a bike past your door.

No surprising though, since he has yet to discover the reality that criminals acquire and use illegal tools, illegally, ie for crimes. Criminals break laws, well who would have thought!

However that billionaire currency dealer Soros' 'Gun control' is about compulsory confiscation and bans of LEGAL assets bought legitimately and used for LAWFUL purposes by LICENSED citizens.

Why would he be wanting to do that? Or is 'gun control' just a clever political scam to keep the media and commentariat busy, instead of looking into those social problems that plague some sectors of society?