The Forum > General Discussion > Should Muslims Who Support Sharia Law In Australia Be Deported?
Should Muslims Who Support Sharia Law In Australia Be Deported?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 37
- 38
- 39
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 16 July 2016 8:35:15 PM
| |
Poirot and Susie are very typical of French regressives ten years ago. Smug and so full of their learnt dogma. The French are unfortunately learning the hard way with the pig headed regressives now in retreat. Obviously our threat is much lower thanks to those who want to limit Islamic immigration. If the regressives get their way they will destroy this country like they have Europe.Of course they will blame everyone else. Thankfully we have enough waking up.
Posted by runner, Saturday, 16 July 2016 10:12:37 PM
| |
"You forgot about being able to have four wives and quickie divorce (see how well that's thought out)". Is Mise.
God yes, they must all be mad. No wonder they are so blood thirsty, having to live with a bunch of wives. Truth be known, all the womens libbers are so frustrated, they dream of becoming Muslim sex slaves. Posted by Hasbeen, Saturday, 16 July 2016 11:23:38 PM
| |
Nah Hasbeen, Muslim sex slaves is obviously your dream, as you brought it up.
I think you have to knock off an infidel or two if you want them to be virgins though... Poirot there is no telling all these scaredy cats that we aren't being overrun by mad Muslim terrorists (2% of the population), but should it ever come to pass that Australia IS taken over by Sharia law, then I want you to know I would be honoured to be your sister-wife... :) Posted by Suseonline, Saturday, 16 July 2016 11:51:56 PM
| |
Suseonline,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAoXgZLRee0 You'd be one of the first apologists wouldn't you, to declare that truck driving killer Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel was not a 'real' Muslim, that he was 'mad', he was 'being discriminated against' and he was a 'loner', a 'lone wolf' and he was French, so 'a French man' not a Muslim did those horrible murders etc. Ten children were among the brutally mangled corpses. Of course there could have been many more were it not for the fact that well trained French police carry long arms on city streets, are stationed at reasonable intervals and are alert for terrorism. Imagine the horrendous carnage in a crowded Australian city street on an occasion where people gather, or just a normal shopping day. A decent sized truck could be driven across Sydney. Powerless Australian police with their puny pistols and with politically correct leadership that for example refused (snubbed!) offered support from trained and rehearsed Australian SAS and Commandos to deal with the Martin Place terrorist. Posted by onthebeach, Sunday, 17 July 2016 1:20:54 AM
| |
//but is it a faith (in the religious sense) or a political movement that is opposed to our own broad political beliefs?//
I consulted the Oxford Dictionary, which provided this definition (emphasis added). Islam: [mass noun] The RELIGION of the Muslims, a monotheistic FAITH regarded as revealed through Muhammad as the Prophet of Allah. So, clearly the former. Posted by Toni Lavis, Sunday, 17 July 2016 5:07:25 AM
|
Lol!...says the indoctrinated fundie Christian.
"...There [sic] support of the butchering of babies is the same as Islamic teaching...."
Oh do tell, runner? You're obviously not averse to bald-faced lying here on the forum. You really are a low type aren't you....you and your little obsession with bringing up butchered babies every second thread.
It's kinda creepy.
In fact almost everything you post is creepy.