The Forum > General Discussion > Should Muslims Who Support Sharia Law In Australia Be Deported?
Should Muslims Who Support Sharia Law In Australia Be Deported?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Page 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- ...
- 37
- 38
- 39
-
- All
I wonder if anyone has ever done an honest economic costing of what it cost the Australian tax payer for security at airports, middle east crime departments, programs to deradicalise, etc etc. And all because of less than 2%of population. Imagine it was 10.
Posted by runner, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 6:32:14 PM
| |
"..."The left finds it perfectly OK to criticise other religions, but what we have done to Muslims in the West is that we only see them through this prism as victims and victimisation, which plays into the hands of those who wish to indoctrinate them and want to present them as victims.."
How dare we see them as victims! If the West could keep its mitts off the region for a while...well... "UK licences £2.8bn of arms sales to Saudis since kingdom entered Yemen war" http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/19/uk-issues-28bn-export-licences-arms-saudi-arabia Our mates, the Saudis....what a monstrous regime - 490 days of mercilessly bombing Yemen - armed by the UK and the US. Here's a good one" "A US warplane hit the forces of an allied Sunni Muslim militant group that Washington had trained in an apparent case of friendly fire in late May, according to a WSJ report. Pentagon has launched an internal investigation." http://www.rt.com/usa/346359-us-friendly-fire-syria/ Happens all the time. And just today: "US air strike in Syria kills up to 85 civilians 'mistaken for Isil fighters'" "Some eight families were hit as they tried to flee fighting in their area, in one of the single deadliest strikes on civilians by the alliance since the start of its operations in the war-torn country. Pictures of the aftermath of the dawn strikes on the Isil-controlled village of Tokhar near Manbij in northern Syria showed the bodies of children as young as three under piles of rubble." (I'm sure "as a mother" that Sonia would have been upset by that as well) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/19/us-air-strike-in-syria-kills-up-to-85-civilians-mistaken-for-isi/ Notwithstanding the many thousands of innocents who have been slaughtered by drone attacks. Or the "millions" who fled Iraq after the US invasion of 2003. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/03/AR2007020301604.html Or the half a million death toll from the war itself: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-24547256 There's a certain karmic irony in Muslims from the middle-east. displaced and traumatised by Western interference, seeking sanctuary in the West. Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 7:51:51 PM
| |
Cont
as per; Koran. Ch33 57. Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger--Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating Punishment. 58. And those who annoy believing men and women undeservedly, bear (on themselves) a calumny and a glaring sin. 59. O prophet! tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested: and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. 60. Truly, if the Hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and those who stir up sedition in the City, desist not, We shall certainly stir thee up against them: then will they not be able to stay in it as thy neighbors for any length of time: 61. They shall have a curse on them: wherever they are found, they shall be seized and slain (without mercy). Ch2 v193. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression. &so many others I’ve run out of my limit. I see you & you followers as exactly what the Krugers, Hansons & a whole heap of other silent majority think. You & your ilk are an endemic danger to Australians. Therefore I support the Positive. Bye! Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 8:11:26 PM
| |
The whole premise behind this question of supporting law, as in this case "Sharia law" is flawed.
What would happen if I was to support law (elements) from other countries, like Germany, Greece, Japan, New Zealand, Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Italy etc....? One example was China's very well known 'one child policy'. This could have serious implications upon Australia if it was implicated, but if someone does want to undertake that and take that move, well I suppose that is their decision. Posted by NathanJ, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:08:56 PM
| |
I forgot to add, If I did follow any other countries laws here.... which country could or would I be deported to? Tough question.
Posted by NathanJ, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:10:31 PM
| |
Poirot, 'It's all America's fault..'
And white men, you left out white men. LOL Already dealt with. Here again, to make it easier for you, "Feminists don’t challenge radical Islam because real misogynists are terrifying JUNE 9, 2015 BY JANET BLOOMFIELD Phyllis Chesler has a piece up at the New York Post demanding to know why feminists refuse to challenge radical Islam in any of its manifestations. The Middle East and Western Africa are burning; Iran is raping female civilians and torturing political prisoners; the Pakistani Taliban are shooting young girls in the head for trying to get an education and disfiguring them with acid if their veils are askew — and yet, NOW passed no resolution opposing this. What is going on? Chesler diagnoses rampant feminist cowardice, and she is quite correct. Feminists are largely spoiled, middle-class white girls unaccustomed to concepts like accountability or responsibility, and courage is a rare sight with this lot. But Chesler misses just what feminists are terrified of: Feminists are, typically, leftists who view “Amerika” and white Christian men as their most dangerous enemies, while remaining silent about Islamist barbarians such as ISIS. Feminists strongly criticize Christianity and Judaism, but they’re strangely reluctant to oppose Islam — as if doing so would be “racist.” They fail to understand that a religion is a belief or an ideology, not a skin color. The new pseudo-feminists are more concerned with racism than with sexism, and disproportionately focused on Western imperialism, colonialism and capitalism than on Islam’s long and ongoing history of imperialism, colonialism, anti-black racism, slavery, forced conversion and gender and religious apartheid. And why? They are terrified of being seen as “politically incorrect” and then demonized and shunned for it..." http://tinyurl.com/q7y4a68 Posted by onthebeach, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:42:06 PM
|