Aww...Jayb....

You failed to criticise those wonderful examples of Aussie nationhood threatening to blow up and/or set fire to the Cessnock city Council.

Now, come come....why aren't you shrieking about this apparent threat of "terrorism" - or don't you think it qualifies because it emanates from feral white Aussies?

poirot: You failed to criticise those wonderful examples of Aussie nationhood threatening to blow up and/or set fire to the Cessnock city Council.

I don't like that sort of behaviour or the behaviour of paedophiles. But now you mention it, I'm glad to see you can criticise Mahammad because he burnt down the religious houses of other religions & was a paedophile too. There are idiots everywhere & I didn't mention it because it not on Subject.

Now, let's get back to the Subject & let's not get waylaid again by your plethora of diversions.

<Should Muslims Who Support Sharia Law In Australia Be Deported?>

Do you support Sharia Law being practiced in Australia?

Jayb,

"...I didn't mention it because it not on Subject."

Lol!...that hasn't stopped you from responding to anything else not directly "on subject".

The reason you didn't criticise it is because they were bomb and arson threats from good white non-Muslim Aussies - and they are apparently exempt from censure around here even when they threaten such things.

Good point, Poirot.

Nobody should be threatening anybody else's right to worship, or to live safely, not even if it's written in the Koran. Nasty messages written on walls on the one hand, or hacking off heads, right arms and left legs on the other - none of any of that barbaric behaviour should be tolerated. The full force of the law should come down on such people. They are a disgrace to Australian values and Australian law.

Now, to get back to JayB's question, and the topic: Should Shari'a or any other alien body of discriminatory 'law' be ever practised in Australia, or allowed to diminish the rights of any Australians, including Muslim women in Australia in any way ?

Keep sticking up for women's frights, Poirot, I'm right there with you.

Cheers,

Joe

Loudmouth,

"...and the topic: Should Shari'a or any other alien body of discriminatory 'law' be ever practised in Australia..."

I thought the thread header - aka "topic" - was "Should Muslims Who Support Sharia Law In Australia Be Deported?"

I think you're all hysterical.

Sharia Law has about as much chance of becoming "Australian Law" as I have of becoming Pope.

"...or hacking off heads, right arms and left legs on the other - none of any of that barbaric behaviour should be tolerated...."

But that's a Saudi speciality...and the Saudis are the West's special friends.

Why are the Saudis the West's special friends?

Because they have the oil and are strategically in the right place.

We've even made them the head of the UN Human Rights Council...and the UK is up for backing them for another term as well as funnelling loads of arms to them to bomb Yemen into the ground.

How's that for double standards?

poirot: But that's a Saudi speciality...and the Saudis are the West's special friends.

Yes a Saudi/moslems speciality.

poirot: We've even made them the head of the UN Human Rights Council...

Yes, I couldn't believe it. One of the worst violators in the World & moslems. It beggers belief doesn't it.

Now let's look at the Question again. "Do you support Sharia Law being practiced in Australia?"

I didn't ask you if it were likely to be made part of Australian Law. (as much chance of becoming "Australian Law" as I have of becoming Pope.) I asked you, "Do you support Sharia Law being practiced in Australia?" Can't you tell the difference?

The question doesn't require another diversion. Just a Yes or No.

Simple Sherlock. Yes/No. That's all. Nothing else required. Now if you can't, or refuse to answer then one would have to assume that you side with the affirmative. Are you afraid to answer because you would be outted as one of those that may need closer scrutiny by the proper authorities. Too late mate.