//seems that soldiers in the US are not allowed to be armed//

Of course they aren't, Is Mise. Check out this picture of various uniforms worn by American soldiers:

http://i.imgur.com/Nldz4oD.jpg

Those things that look like rifles? They're just military-issue B.S. Detectors, which are the standard equipment of all US soldiers since B.S. Johnson of Sitka, Alaska, invented the device in 1863. Prior to that American soldiers had to make to do with replica B.S. Detectors fashioned from balsa wood and polystyrene and painted to look like the real thing.

So now it's 'Levity' Lavis?
Care to explain why the police had to be called to the army base and why it was they that shot the gunman?

Paul,

Anything on those unannounced Green sanctioned calls by the police on law abiding citizens who have been judged to be of good character by the Police Commissioner?

onthebeach
Had a bit to do with the Hilton thing back then
Pederick was a police informer with a very dubious record.
We locked the wrong people up for that one although we later admitted it but couldn't bag the ASIO people,

We all know the police did the Whiskey Go Go thing. John Andrew was one of my Sydney snitches and a scapegoat.
Why would you parole and deport someone who allegedly committed such a horrible crime after a relatively short time in the clink if it wasn't to shut down the show.

Is Mise, I am both comfortable and supportive of Greens policy on this, and firearms policy in general. As I have answered your questions, I have one for you concerning;

An instructor at a shooting range in Arizona has died after a nine-year-old girl shot him in the head with an Uzi sub-machinegun he was showing her how to use the weapon.

Who do you consider at fault, assuming you consider someone at fault? To make it easy multi choice.

(A) The instructor for putting his big head in the road.
(B) The 9 year old girl for being so stuiped in not knowning how to use a sub-machinegun
(C) The fools in government who allow such lax'd laws that puts an horrific weapon in the hand of a child.
(D) Other, please explain your answer.

Take your time i am sure the answer requires a lot of thought. Waiting.

Dear Paul,

It is a bit disturbing when people fight over who can
be allowed to have a marriage licence but don't give a
shyte about who can have an assault rifle.

Fox,

You and Paul1405 are joined at the hip politically, so there is no surprise that you would be trying to support, even out-do his outrageous claim that Australia has become a 'Police State'.

You are the poster who wasted pages asserting that 'Schoolies' were more dangerous than the outlaw bikies and their violence on the Gold Coast.

At the time the bikies' violence and fights over drug territory, had spilled over to brawls in family restaurants and the bikies surrounding a police station, holding the police hostage and threatening theirs and their families' lives if they didn't set a bikie free.

You also defend Labor Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP, who along with the Greens promised before the Qld election to 'deep six' the police-supported, highly successful anti-bikie law and is now doing so. Meanwhile foreign gangs for instance the 'Black Power' bikies from NZ have moved their operations to Queensland.