Fascinating, Is Mise!

<< Q. How could anyone have explored the things that I have explored here without you and most others in the debate thinking really poorly of me?

A. Absolutely impossible. >>

But then…

<< Q. Or would you have preferred that all the things I have raised remained unspoken… and the very narrow perspective of this whole issue upheld?

A. No and no, >>

So where does that leave us?

You would not have preferred that the things I have raised went unmentioned. But to simply mention them incurs the wrath of many people, and leads you directly to think that I have dug a deep hole for myself.

That’s highly conflicting stuff Is Mise. Please, think a bit more about that.

<< "I particularly question the magnitude of the prison sentence,....

I do not have an issue with the length of the sentence that Harris has received,...."

Make up your mind. >>

Oh come on. That’s being particularly silly. You know that those two statements were made in entirely different contexts, as clearly explained in my last double post. To conflate them like you have to make them appear to be conflicting is highly dodgy, which anyone can immediately see upon reading my original comments. You do your credibility a real disservice with this sort of thing.

<< You may have a different attitude to the crime and Harris, and therefore could perceive Harris was treated harshly. If that is the case, I do not agree. >>

Fair enough Paul.

Thanks for your post outlining just how you feel about this issue. I respect your views.

Credit where credit is due, you can dig the hole deeper.

<< Harris may well have been having "a bit of fun" but that doesn't make it right.
I have dealt with hundreds of perverts, rock spiders and pedophiliac killers in my police life and this bloke fits the profile of a sick weirdo if I have ever seen one. >>

Chris, that’s a bit concerning.

If you have dealt with all manner of rotten people in your working life then you must surely realise that Harris is not amongst the worst of them, and indeed is surely not in the ‘sick weirdo’ class. He’d have to be in the ‘little bit weird’ class at worst.

I mean, it is all relative. Pedophilia extends from opportunistic brief episodes of touching at one end of the scale all the way up to kidnap for decades, and rape and murder.

So, Jay is no longer with us. Poirot must be saddened at the loss of her new best friend.

Jay was off the rails right from the start. No one would respond to him because he was so obviously completely irrational and seething with hatred.

Then as Poirot slipped from calm rationality at the start of this thread, into a more and more decrepit state of mind, she started to embrace Jay. Then they both just slipped quietly… no, actually, very noisily, into complete insanity!!

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6518#194172 Haaahahahaa!

This thread has been and continues to be an amazing study in psychology, or I should say: psychosis, or perhaps sickology!!

It makes old Rolf’s antics look very tame indeed! (:>)

Ludwig did not complain to the moderator.