driving gives me plenty of opportunity to observe lots of very aggressive driving.
R0bert,
Yes, but think that it also gives other drivers plenty of opportunity to observe you as well.
Are you right or do you just think so ?
We as a society need to view everything we do as doing it within the rails like a railway. Zig Zag, bounce off the inside of the rails do whatever you feel you need to do but do not jump the rails or try to widen or narrow the rails because if you do the train de-rails. Our integrity devoid Defence lawyers are always encouraging the deviates from jumping the rails & that's the huge problem we're facing now. Too much individual rights & absolutely zilch responsibility.

R0bert,

I hope you are not assuming that anyone with a differing view is ipso facto on the 'other side' politically.

I criticise both sides. It is a fact that Labor chases cheap votes by limiting DV to women and children. That continues the gender war that was waged by ex-PM Julia Whatshername and her front bench Leftie Emily's Listers. I would go further to say that these arrogant, self-interested educated middle class women have been doing very well for themselves and shamelessly so.

DV shouldn't be a wedge to win votes from already advantaged educated middle class women and the easily influenced who cannot think for themselves. Violence is violence and all partner violence is abhorrent. As well, why isn't the feminist definition of violence being applied equally to male victims and to lesbian violence as well.

Before anyone dives into a debate about women and men and whether women are more bossy etc. to me men thesedays –

Please FIRST explain to ALL the parameters of the scenario you wish to discuss. That is for instance, are we referring to ALL women in our modern Australia [composed of millions of people not from Anglo or even European cultures] or is it ONLY the white middle class to upper class section of our nation, AS I SUSPECT is what the author means here.

The reason such a clear definition of women and in what setting is outline, NO debate on the issue in modern Australia can actually ensue. This can be for numerous and varying reasons not the least may be that many newer non-western type culture/ethnic groups that now live as citizens here may themselves not be on exact par and in tune exactly with what we the westerner sees to be the highest and superior way of things. I mean, like in Anglo culture 50-100 years ago the roles of men and women were very different where usually the male dominated and controlled the family and had the career and freedoms whilst “the wife” stayed home, cooked and cleaned and popped out the kids. That geneder inequality was reflected in many aspects of society including law. BUT I know of some more traditionalist cultures [like Greeks, Turks, Muslims and even Islander communities like Tonga etc] where women are STILL in the role that our smallish western cultural section of the nation had 100 years earlier.

You see IF this is not clarified you may give off the impression [true or false?] that you and the other posters in secret must SEE their own western ways and their own little ALL white suburbs as the ONLY one that matters since they ALWAYS seems to refer to that as a point of reference in such debates.
That could lead the 50% or so non-white Aussies to assume you consider them less and not even really present, at least until they all convert into a westerner.

That could lead the 50% or so non-white Aussies to assume you consider them less and not even really present, at least until they all convert into a westerner.
Posted by Jottiikii, Wednesday, 2 July 2014 5:19:34 PM

You raise a very valid point, considering that non-anglo immigration has risen over the last few years.

I do know that certain sections Mediterranean groups of immigrants use to and perhaps still look down on the anglo saxons and visa a versa.

Why are the australian indigenous so quiet about this new invasion ? They were extremely vocal about the Europeans but suddenly it's all quiet. Which immigration are they more inclined to tolerate ?
It would be good if they could lay their cards on table after all it is originally their country.
Are they perhaps sympathisers of the new invaders because they too have a history of treating their females differently ?
Please correct me if I am wrong.

u ain seen nuthin/yet
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/nsa-linux-journal-extremist-forum-and-its-readers-get-flagged-extra-surveillance

Is Christine Lagarde The Most Dangerous Woman In The World?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-03/expropriation-back-christine-lagarde-most-dangerous-woman-world

I have gone on record that the most dangerous organization is the now French led IMF with Christine Lagarde at the helm, which has presented a concept report that debt cuts for over-indebted states are uncompromising and are to be performed more effectively in the future by defaulting on retirement accounts held in life insurance, mutual funds and other types of pension schemes, or arbitrarily extending debt perpetually so you cannot redeem.

Yes you read correctly, The new IMF paper is described in great detail exactly how to now allow the private sector, which has invested in government bonds, to be expropriated to pay for the national debts of the socialist governments.

http://12160.info/xn/detail/2649739:Topic:1480624

http://nwo-patriot-link-news.blogspot.com/2014/07/google-is-being-forced-to-censor.html

http://www.newsforage.com/2014/07/goldman-sachs-asks-judge-to-force.html
Expropriation Is Back -
http://rt.com/usa/170172-nypd-arrest-subway-sleeping/
http://investmentwatchblog.com/virginia-high-schooler-threatens-suicide-police-arrive-and-kill-him/