"Shockadelic>> Try transplanting the heart of a Negroid into a Mongoloid.<<
sonofgloin >>I couldn't even guess what you mean by that shocko...."<<

Shockadelic>> The more different the genetics of a patient and donor, the more likelihood of rejection.
No organ transplant between races would ever be recommended by a specialist in that field.<<

Shocko the best transplant options come from direct blood relatives, the closer the better. Caucasian on Caucasian transplants need to have in place ongoing rejection minimisation protocols...so white on white isn’t the same tiger.

sonofgloin >>"I accept their right to immigrate"<<

Shockadelic>> There is no such "right".<<

Of course they have a right to apply for immigration....we have a set immigration program in place. The problem is not that anti western applicants with an anti Judeo Christian ethos apply for immigration......the problem is that the politically correct driven governments and public servants let them in

sonofgloin "Shocko the best transplant options come from direct blood relatives"

How is this contradicting me?
Aren't your blood relatives the same race?

A Zulu and a Thai are not going to be direct blood relatives, are they?

You're right and I'm right.
The *closer* the match the better.
So a White donor is better than a Black or Asian donor, if you're White (which most of our population is).

"Of course they have a right to apply for immigration"

You didn't say "apply" and neither did I.

I can apply for university admission. I don't have a "right" to admission.
I can apply for a bank loan. I don't have a "right" to one.

I'm so sick of this petty nitpicking.

Austrian MP Ewald Stadler speaks about Muslim immigration in response to comments made by the Turkish ambassador:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2-e6_Bdzyc
For those who didn't know BZÖ is a right wing Liberal/Conservative party, they previously held several seats in the Austrian parliament but were swept out in 2013.
I post it not in support of that strand of politics, which I regard as somewhat worse than the others but to direct attention to the point he makes about the reputation of Islam.
Why Foxy, Suse, Producer et al do you pay any heed to the words of those speaking in defense of ethnic groups who are utterly disreputable and whose actions surely speak for themselves?
Why are you so scared of thinking for yourselves that you outsource it to people of other ethnic groups and adopt their self serving opinions and attitudes as your own?
There's something we call "Third Culture", that is the observation that Whites who've either spent a lot of time overseas or among non Whites will develop as a coping mechanism a third culture, a sort of Stockholm syndrome if you will.
The same is true of White people who've been educated in universities where non White Anti Racist activism has replaced European philosophy as the core of the Arts syllabus. In order to cope and in order to receive his licence to practice the Liberal Arts (diploma) the student has to develop a third culture or third persona which straddles his ancestral world and the world of the ethnic minorities.
Do you really wonder why people who've not attended an academy and thus who've never been duly deputised to pass off the self serving ideas of other ethnic groups as "popular opinion" see you as traitors, or as little more than aliens in your own right?

accommodation leads to enslavement
HOW COME OUR MEDIA NEVER TOLD US ABOUT Stopping accommodating intimidation..REFLECTED BY PEOPLE Running away from home/

why they are running.
the reason is bigger that the eurika stockade or mosus leaving the desert/or fiddling while rome burnS

HISTORY REPEATS..THIS is a key point of the cycle
IT Might just have united the SHEEP TO LIE WITH THE WAR LAMB

IM JUST FEEDING ON THE timing of it
HOPE YOU FIND THE Time to listen to it[or if not spead it around]...EVENTS DONT GEt bigger than thIS/

WAR IS OVER..PEACE is here..if you want to.

http://rss.infowars.com/20140414_Mon_Alex.mp3

ps let it grow*

Yuyutsu interestingly plays through the levels the usual Leftist travels when discussing same issues.

NOTE for FUTURE the way the usual LETIST pretends their way to some "moral directive" they conclude into being.

He begins by agreeing that all forms of abuse and oppression etc. such as “forced marriage”, “underage marriage”, “violence”
is wrong and should be fixed.

But then in an ‘existential Wonderland" Yuyutsu jumps to insert some arbitrary clause or qualifier when he now asks -

“But what if the girl genuinely doesn't want to be helped?”. . . meaning that in such cases we should NOT interfere.

So completely undoing any grip Yuyutsu intended to have as to any INITIAL universal moral premises the inserted 'qualifier' renders any occurrences of oppression might be BAD and WRONG but ONLY IF the alleged Victim themselves is “asking for help”.

. . . which Yuyutsu WARNS such that if . . . “government is allowed to interfere and "help" those who never sought its help in the first place and who were not even likely to consider requesting its help if freely-offered” will result in a “slippery-slope”.

The final conclusion from these non-logically connections -

. . . “Today it's the sins of those Lebanese" . . . "but tomorrow it would be your own sins that are banned" . . . and . . .

. . . as yet another further plunder into logical absurdity Yuyutsu makes dangerous light of serious crimes and actions by manufacturing for his conclusion's support the 'non-existent truths' that (Yuyutsu claims) things like gender oppression or apartheid to non-ethical actions like “nose-picking” and “obesity” which now are conflated into a general species of “sins” in Yuyutsu's conceptions.

I can show you how in fact this path leads to same as morally perverse and selfish criminals.

SIDE Note - Usually the Leftist will protect that conclusion and untrue facts of ontology in similarity of kinds, such that ANY kind of Vicious and extreme method of fear tactics by "guilting" and "ridiculing" anyone who opposes.

Dear Jottikii,

Nothing new about the Left accusing me of being a Rightist and the Right accusing me of being a Leftist - I care for neither anyway.

Yes, I said that oppression is bad and wrong. I stand by it.

I did not say however (as you claim) that this automatically gives you a right to fix it.

Instead, I analysed carefully when you have a right to fix the situation and when you don't.

I also didn't say that underage marriage is necessarily a form of oppression, what I said is that it often is, but not necessarily always.

If you believe (rightly or wrongly) that marrying too young is bad for you, hence it is your right, if not even duty, to forcibly stop young girls from marrying - then what on earth stops me from believing (rightly or wrongly) that since nose-picking is bad for you, I have a right, if not even duty, to forcibly place hand-cuffs on you to prevent you from picking your nose?