Dear Jay,

A society is ultimately judged by how it treats
its most vunerable. And as history has shown us -
the so called "strong" eventually do get defeated.
Here's something I've dug up about the "strong."

"Somebody in France wanted to put Voltaire in jail.
Somebody in Franco's Spain sent Lorca, their
greatest poet to death before a firing squad. Somebody in
Germany under Hitler burned the books, drove Thomas
Mann into exile, and led their Jewish scholars to the
gas chamber. Somebody in Greece long ago gave Socrates the
hemlock to drink, Somebody in the USSR banned Solzhenitsyn
and Pasternak. Somebody at Golgotha erected a cross and
somebody drove nails into the hands of Christ. Somebody spat
on his garments. NO ONE REMEMBERS THEIR NAMES."

(Milton Meltzer).

So much for the "strong."

There is nothing in the OP to suggest that the poster was against all immigration. Likewise, the OP was not about refusing genuine refugees, that is another matter.

So there is no call at all to haul ass down some gully admonishing all for presumed poor treatment of the most vulnerable. That is just another diversion.

Rather the OP seems to be posing the question, should the goal be diversity as it seems to be, which is an entirely different to what the population understands to be the legitimate aims and purposes of immigration policy.

There are those who were always dissatisfied with Australian culture and traditions. They are not do-gooders, but people whochoose to deliberately discriminate against the British inheritance and even the 'whites' themselves where those 'whites' are assumed to be British. There has always been a cultural elitism of the Left that is seen rightly as a cultural cringe, a genuflection and preference to and for all and anything that is not recognisably Australian, especially where links can be drawn with the British inheritance.

There is also the other serious matter that has not been raised with the electorate, which is the promotion of educational multiculturalism. The extension of this policy as seen in the US for example, is the encouragement of any school child to recognise himself by his assumed cultural origin first, as in African-American.

My earlier post, blown off by Foxy, refers,

onthebeach, Sunday, 13 April 2014 10:42:27 PM
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6333&page=20

Why not discuss the elephant in the room since it was raised by the OP?

Foxy,
Well there you go, Milton Meltzer is your point of rebuttal and you wonder why we mock you!
Why not throw in some references to other "Anti Racist", White hating fraudsters too? What about some Jared Diamond,Tim Wise or Stephen Jay Gould hmmm?
This is the fear we have over you and your kind Foxy, you don't think like normal, healthy White people, you take all your instruction from people of other races and define yourself by their way of seeing the world.
So yeah, we functioning, self aware White people don't want you and your kind/caste/sect..whatever having any influence over immigration policy nor any other public policy for that matter, you're not fit and proper persons for administrative positions.
Here, I can quote chapter and verse too:
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/chrysostom_adversus_judaeos_01_homily1.htm
(7) The Jews frighten you as if you were little children, and you do not see it. Many wicked slaves show frightening and ridiculous masks to youngsters-the masks are not frightening by their nature, but they seem so to the children's simple minds-and in this way they stir up many a laugh. This is the way the Jews frighten the simpler-minded Christians with the bugbears and hobgoblins of their shrines. Yet how could their ridiculous and disgraceful synagogues frighten you? Are they not the shrines of men who have been rejected, dishonored, and condemned?

Dear Jay,

You certainly have made your position very clear.
And your words speak volumes. They say more about
you than they do about me.

However, gratefully you are a very small minority
who won't even make a dent in the general scheme
of things.
Thankfully most Australians will assign you to the
dust pile of history - where you rightfully belong.

otb,

When you begin to interact on this forum as a decent human being
I shall be happy to inter-act with you. However until
then, I'm simply not interested in your rants.
Feel free however to enjoy your gruntlehood. That's the price
we pay for freedom of speech.

Good afternoon to you SPQR...

I was reading through your most recent post, where you've quoted a Dr Tanveer AHMED as saying how police are somewhat disinclined to either 'act' or intervene in disputes arising out of domestic violence issues, involving people from Middle Eastern or South Asian cultures ?

Rather they tend to leave it to the quarrelling couple to sort it out themselves. In preference to police overtly getting involved, and perhaps run the risk of the whole episode rapidly degenerating and become quite violent ?

SPQR, the quotation is pretty accurate in my view. The coppers have enough problems dealing with ordinary criminal matters, rather then trying to sort through all these intractable and potentially violent, alien domestics ! Rarely will either of the two belligerent protagonists speak in English (even if they can!), usually they communicate (shout!) in their native tongue ! Therefore, the poor ol' coppers have no idea what's been said, therefore it all devolves into a very ugly mess at the bottom of the toilet. With neither winner or loser, and with another 'long' nail in the coffin of multiculturalism !

NathanJ "I am offended by the terms 'white' and 'black'"

The terms are irrelevant. They're not even accurate.

"White" people are mostly pinky-cream and "Blacks" have light-coloured palms and soles.

But these are the terms people have invented and understand.

We could call Europeans "Ziggers" and non-Europeans "Zaggers" if you like.

So, I want immigration restricted to Ziggers, as they are related/similar to us, and therefore more easily adapt and cause a minimum of social disruption, unlike Zaggers.

Happy now?

Gramps: Scottish, British, German, French.

White, White, White, White.

"I've always wondered if I was 'sent home' where would I go?"

You're already there.

Though you may be cut up into pieces by your exotic neighbours when The War starts.

Producer, "common Mitochondrial DNA."

Hundreds of thousands of years have passed since then.

We exist *now* and *our* people have the same right to perpetuate our contemporary biocultural distinctiveness as the Thai, Zulus and Egyptians do.

"Technology has given us the ability to converse with the world."

Then you don't need to move millions of people from one side of the planet to the other.

Just log on and indulge.
Nobody needs to move an inch.

one under god "its not their fault they have race ENVY..[Lacking their OWN 'PURE' ID"

I have no problem with White Australians being a mongrel/hybrid.

We have such a diverse range of faces and features (hair/eyes/build).
There is no "typical" Australian morphology.
But we are a mix of peoples who were *related* in the first place!

We're like a mongrel hound.
Descended from many types of hound, but *only* hounds, not all dogs.

Foxy "A society is ultimately judged by how it treats its most vulnerable."

They're only vulnerable because they've been transplanted from the society where they belonged to a society which they have little or no connection to.

Stop doing that and Voila!, no more artificially introduced Vulnerables.

onthebeach "preference to and for all and anything that is not recognisably Australian"

This isn't just an "Australian/British" phenomenon though.
The same anti-White mentality is present in America, France, Scandinavia...
An international toxin.