Belly, true we are now racist.
Why is it so ?

Very simple, it has been earned.

Those on Manus can ask to be sent home & they are given I think $1000
& a plane ticket. So if they don't like it there they can leave.

Actually, Islam is a political movement.
Its whole philosophy is fascist. The Imman of Jerusalem praised Hitler
for gassing the Jews, and urged him to intensify the process.
It started out in life as a band of brigands and built a religion to
give themselves an excuse.
They attacked and invaded what is now Israel and killed or expelled
the Jews and Christians.

They have not changed their objectives since that time.
Like Hitler they want to rule the world.

Oh yes Australia has been critisised for human right breaches regarding
the death in Manus Island.
Who made the complaint, wait for it,, China !

Belly,

Attacking Islam is not racist as Islam is not a person or persons, it is a political ideology pure and simple, and as it sets out to destroy our way of life then it should be resisted at all levels and banned in this country.

Paul,
Reductio Ad Hitlerum, the favoured tactic of the boorish anti intellectual.
You may not be aware (understandably since very little relevant material has appeared in english) that the extermination myth has been dead since 2002 when Horst Mahler served a criminal writ upon Der Spiegel journalist Fritjof Meyer after the publication of his article
"The Number of Victims of Auschwitz: New Findings in the Light of Newly-Discovered Documents".
The German government backed down and declined to prosecute Meyer and acknowledged that revising estimated death tolls at Auschwitz and other camps did not constitute "Holocaust Denial" or "Incitement Of the Masses". This you will agree is a fundamental change in the legal position, the German state is now effectively consenting to Meyer's rather bizarre estimate of 300,000 or so victims of homicidal gassings and repudiation of the Birkenau gas chamber orthodoxy.
Sorry Paul you can't get away with those analogies anymore, it weakens your argument and destroys you credibility when you use lies to vilify people you don't like.
It's actually an appalling post and Mr Abbott would be able to sue you for defamation, it'd be an open and shut case.

I forgot to mention one basic flaw in your argument, the Nazis never publicly tried to justify the "extermination" of Jews to anyone, it was a secret remember?

This thread has certainly brought out the predictable response from the regulars amongst the 'Usual Suspects'.
This comment sums up the attitude of some of these.

“This time the locals may just have taught them a lesson, so one died that is a bit unfortunate, now we have to put some effort into digging a hole to bury him. They cause us no end of inconvenience!"

"it's actually an appalling post and Mr Abbott would be able to sue you for defamation, it'd be an open and shut case"
Jay, not only an expert on everything but a lawyer to boot. where did you get your law degree out of the Cornflakes Box?
I in fact said Abbott is guilty of what can be termed 'Moral Relativism' the most famous example of moral relativism is the Nazi justification for the extermination of the Jews. Some when confronted with overwhelming evidence become histories revisionists.
What a statement "I forgot to mention one basic flaw in your argument, the Nazis never publicly tried to justify the "extermination" of Jews to anyone, it was a secret remember?" Jay, you need to read more, see if you can find out what Himmler had to say on the subject to the SS, basically " its a dirty job but someone has to do it.". But then its appalling that one would deny the destruction of 6 million people.

'I in fact said Abbott is guilty of what can be termed 'Moral Relativism' the most famous example of moral relativism is the Nazi justification for the extermination of the Jews. '

yep Paul the favourite doctrine of secular humanist and then they show their hypocrisy by insisting on absolutes.