The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Lady Di ' Unlawful Killing'

Lady Di ' Unlawful Killing'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. All
Neat, WmTrevor, neat!
Posted by Is Mise, Thursday, 9 January 2014 10:58:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Wmtrevor you seem to ignore the fact that the British legal system swears allegiance to the Queen. How can anyone get a just hearing against such a system ?

Mohommad Fayed cannot sue the Royals even with good evidence because any damages must first pass via the Royal approved legal system.
Posted by Arjay, Friday, 10 January 2014 5:58:10 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If you are referring to these, Arjay:

"When judges are sworn in they take two oaths/affirmations. The first is the oath of allegiance and the second the judicial oath; these are collectively referred to as the judicial oath.

Oath of allegiance

“I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and successors, according to law.”

Judicial oath

“I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ________ , and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will."

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/introduction-to-justice-system/oaths

I think the 'according to law' and 'do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will' should set Mr. Al-Fayed's mind at ease in that he is, by such oaths, guaranteed fair treatment even if he doesn't have good evidence.

The trouble is that he has no evidence of any credence with which to justify his assertions... what sort of person could do that and still maintain their argument with a straight face? Not once, but ad nauseam?
Posted by WmTrevor, Friday, 10 January 2014 7:06:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Wmtrevor see the doco and Dianna Spencer says "they want me out of the way but I'm not going easily." Her own words are an indictment of these evil people.

There are 3 groups who had a motive.1/ the Royals because she would have made their family relatives to Arabs whom they detest.2/ The Military Industrial Complex because Dianna was waging a campaign against land mines.3/ The Zionists because Dianna was going to take up the Palistinian cause also.

Legal Nepotism and Royalty go hand in hand. Money and power buys a lot of judgement. Legality and truth are rarely bed fellows.I bet you have not even seen this doco.
Posted by Arjay, Friday, 10 January 2014 8:02:20 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
On the other hand there were those spoilt mental juveniles in a powerful car who got their kicks from playing cat and mouse with the media and never considered the road laws might apply to them or that there might be others using the road.

Did I add the drunk driver with a big foot on the gas pedal?

It was sad. It was avoidable. On this occasion no other innocent members of the public were affected. Just imagine though, your loved ones use roads too. There are always those who flaunt the law and put them in danger.

How ever did these egocentric, arrogant twits got away with behaviour like that for so long? Of course they must have been apprehended before. Did their power and influence always protect them as a privileged species? Perhaps there is a story in that?
Posted by onthebeach, Friday, 10 January 2014 8:17:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
0F COURSE LADY DI HAD TO DIE
JUST LIKE SEAL TEAM SIX..HAD TO DIE..[to preserve the bin larden lie

http://topinfopost.com/2014/01/04/michael-savage-seal-team-6-was-assassinated-executed SEAL Team 6 was assassinated, executed

SAME SAME

http://topinfopost.com/2013/06/21/over-20-seals-who-killed-osama-bin-laden-now-dead

http://topinfopost.com/2013/05/06/osama-bin-laden-died-of-natural-causes-according-to-former-cia-agent

http://topinfopost.com/2014/01/06/dick-cheney-says-osama-bin-laden-not-behind-911

THE system..first kills those who keep secrets.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Vq39xQojI9k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csbzgoYlU_c&feature=youtu.be
Posted by one under god, Friday, 10 January 2014 9:43:37 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy