The Forum > General Discussion > We got it wrong on warming, says IPCC
We got it wrong on warming, says IPCC
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Page 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
-
- All
Posted by ozdoc, Tuesday, 1 October 2013 6:13:43 PM
| |
its sad doc..you got a link
keep wavinng it..like a futile talisman..you cant paraphrase its spin thing is acid is acid watch mrs clark..watch..the color goes into..chalk now if you put chalk in acid..it bubbles..co2..and neutralises the acid get it? any shells at all just those white cliffs of dover just the barrier reef..refute your acid thesis just like the acid..EATS the chalk.. as it bring's back up..the ph alkalinity no shell..can survive acid..[not even coke] many/shells..in the ocean..prove its not acid *Why We're Shutting Off Our Comments Starting today, PopularScience.com will no longer accept comments on new articles. Here's why. A politically motivated, decades-long war on expertise has eroded the popular consensus on a wide variety of scientifically validated topics. Everything, from evolution to the origins of climate change, is mistakenly up for grabs again>> they are bothfrauds relying on gullibl;e takeninby graphs/drawings http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/why-were-shutting-our-comments In other words, Popular Science is getting tired of all the comments pointing out where Popular Science is wrong, especially about human-caused global warming. And Popular Science is not the only corporate media now shutting off comments to save face. And what this will mean is FEWER people will be reading Popular Science, because the public has a taste for being able to contribute to the discussions now, and will favor the independent media, where the First third pier..Amendment is..(not to mention the truth) dont panicthe sheep put up a glossy talisman..web sight of claptrap for oz doc's case..is that weak..and his brain strain..flows down the drai Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 1 October 2013 7:46:29 PM
| |
ozdoc, love yer links.
I apologise for feeding the troll, causing anyone following this thread a stressed scrolling forefinger. Won't do it again Posted by Luciferase, Tuesday, 1 October 2013 10:18:54 PM
| |
Hey Luciferase, no apologies required - we learn something everyday, except maybe "village idiots".
Posted by ozdoc, Tuesday, 1 October 2013 10:36:40 PM
| |
Lucyface,
I am quite familiar with the thread in which you got your Rs kicked. My point was simply that unilateral action does nothing for the climate. So stop being pathetic and address the real issue. Unilateral action does nothing for climate change. Posted by Shadow Minister, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 4:48:11 AM
| |
Lucyface?
Gee you sometimes look child like SM. A day is coming. The Liberal coalition will adopt John Howard,s *Climate Change Policy* Putting a price, free market floating one, on our emissions. SM then will confront his own words and make every effort to tell us he always believed that is the way to go. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 5:46:24 AM
|
For Joe and other like minded souls:
Look at figure 2 if you have difficulty with the explanation/maths.
http://pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/A+primer+on+pH