The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > We got it wrong on warming, says IPCC

We got it wrong on warming, says IPCC

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 27
  7. 28
  8. 29
  9. Page 30
  10. 31
  11. 32
  12. 33
  13. ...
  14. 40
  15. 41
  16. 42
  17. All
poirot<<..australian wood production would need to be around four times what it currently is by 2020.>>

that seems achievabl;e[oinlight of that failed forrrestry tree planting[that went bust]

they plan to clear fell..all thaT boughtnup farmlandf
via TAX DEDUCYTABLE INVESTMENT..tax deductable tree plantings..now the cost of destroying them

but wait!

FOUR TIMES PRESENT?
these things double..in size every season!
injust four years..they will be spot on?

so simply pass a new law against ripping that stuff out

doone

as for..<<The minimum land requirements for this additional wood production would be close to two times the size of Sydney by 2020.">>

they..all ready done..that
for gods sake dont allow them to clear fell..THAT OUR INVESTED DOLLARS..

all ready..BUILT
and if they clear fell..sue them
for theft of tax deductions..on work..we paid for long ago

anyhow
im..over it
but focus clearly..at the end of the chart
and see its govts ..LOL..govt agencies..talking about more tax deductible/guilt..

payable by us..for their lobbied pals..
to get the next free lunch..from..the public purse..[as usual]
Posted by one under god, Sunday, 29 September 2013 1:52:09 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What is it with the childish antics by some around here who haven't got the maturity to address fellow posters by their chosen monikers or even a respectful abbreviation of it?

Joe, why is it so appealing for you to repeated call Luciferase "Luciferade".

Yes, I know it reveals more about your style than it does his...but why such childish behaviour?

Why such disrespect, in lieu of argument - and would you advocate such behaviour to the younger generation?

What exactly does it do for you?

I can understand that it makes a six year-old feel clever and even sophisticated, but I have trouble equating it with mature discussion.

Is it an older man thing?

Second childhood?

This place is beyond me sometimes.
Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 29 September 2013 1:52:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Sorry - fat fingers, Parrot. And failing eyesight.

But if you think that mis-xspelling names iws more improtant than AGW, or what to ddeo about it, then go folr it.

Cheers :)

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 29 September 2013 2:58:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Loudmouth,

What a silly little boy you are for an old guy.

Why in the world do you bother posting on adult subjects when you indulge in such puerile antics.

So the upshot is that you get your jollies from irritating people kiddie-stye when debating on a grown-up forum.

My 12 year-old has a far better idea of respect than you do.

Pathetic.
Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 29 September 2013 3:06:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Calm it down, Joe's good, "d" and "s" are adjacent on the keyboard, especially when it's dark. No offense, but Poirot's generalization is true. I am guilty myself in relation to a particular provocateur (who's earned it). Can't promise to stop, but will try.
Posted by Luciferase, Sunday, 29 September 2013 3:29:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
But if you think that mis-xspelling names iws more improtant than AGW, or what to ddeo about it, then go folr it.

Cheers :)

Joe

Don't be so silly Joe, Poirot has never had a thought about global warming, or anything much else actually.

She simply follows the lefty line/spin of the day, whatever it is, & regurgitates it, with a bit of her own unpleasantness here for us all to admire.

I originally did try to engage her in discussion, but quickly realised there was nothing there to engage.

Probably a language specialist. I wonder if she speaks Mandarin?
Posted by Hasbeen, Sunday, 29 September 2013 5:03:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 27
  7. 28
  8. 29
  9. Page 30
  10. 31
  11. 32
  12. 33
  13. ...
  14. 40
  15. 41
  16. 42
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy