The Forum > General Discussion > The 'real' Kevin Rudd is back
The 'real' Kevin Rudd is back
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Page 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- ...
- 38
- 39
- 40
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Saturday, 31 August 2013 9:10:11 AM
| |
Labor had released costings of nearly 50 polices since its economic statement in early August, keeping to the Charter of Budget Honesty. Look at the website to see how many the LNP has lodged.
The LNP says it has the marvelous and magical things promised to all and sundry fully budgeted and costed, but refuses to reveal it to any official scrutiny despite saying it would do so. It should spare us its hubris over Labor's attempt to out it over this and to make it accountable. The Parliamentary Budget Office said it was inappropriate to imply that the PBO has costed LNP policy. Fine, but then Abbott says this is an implicit statement that LNP costings are accurate, misrepresenting the PBO himself to pull the wool over electors eyes. One week to go. Posted by Luciferase, Saturday, 31 August 2013 10:06:02 AM
| |
"his (Dudd's) numbers look more likely to add up than Mr Abbott’s"
Considering that Labor has yet to produce year end results that come anywhere near the budget, I would comfortably say that was a particularly stupid or partisan statement. http://resources2.news.com.au/images/2013/08/30/1226707/809074-130831-bill-leak-gallery.jpg As for Dudd's collection of thought bubbles that make up its manefesto, you would have to be daft to think it was coherent. Many are rehashed policies from 2007 which were never delivered. As for Dudd's $10bn fraud that he tried to pull on the voters, he no longer has any credibility on costings or anything else. Posted by Shadow Minister, Saturday, 31 August 2013 10:34:57 AM
| |
Luciferase,
"The Parliamentary Budget Office said it was inappropriate to imply that the PBO has costed LNP policy. Fine, but then Abbott says this is an implicit statement that LNP costings are accurate, misrepresenting the PBO himself to pull the wool over electors eyes." Precisely! SM, The Economist says: ".....but Mr Rudd gets our vote, largely because of Labor’s decent record...." That's ".....because of Labor's decent record...." Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 31 August 2013 10:35:12 AM
| |
i have NEVER
seen ANYONE..as HAPPY..as kevin in his concession speech..* he is so happy.. *to have avoided..the upcoming debacle in syria! http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5984&page=0 Posted by one under god, Saturday, 7 September 2013 9:54:16 PM
| |
If he did one thing well, it was the delivery of that speech!
Posted by Ludwig, Saturday, 7 September 2013 10:01:23 PM
|
kevs minders ARE WATCHING
there have been some interesting..developments david
as you..your lot..think to know*
<<A reporter with Israel’s most widely read newspaper..has been told by defense establishment officials..that a US-led attack on Syria will begin on Saturday..and end when Barack Obama meets Vladimir Putin on Wednesday.>>
i trust your..both wrong
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5984#170948
i trust..it ends here...
get it?
HOW COME ..the alternate pm
isnt being deluged..with the same INTERNATIONAL..questions..as the current pm..
cause thats his weakness
yet..in 8 days
HE WILL BE PM..*!*
and look..like a fool..**!**
cause the media never TESTED him..!
nor asked him..what he is going to do?
fool me once,,shame on you
fool me twice..shame on..*me