Tony Abbott showed ‘imself to be a screwey dill at Rooty Hill!!

Hwaa hwa hwa !¡!

Pelican both Oz & the Labor party would perhaps not be in the deep doo doo we are now, if they had really won the election. I don't think that is true, but it may be.

Just perhaps Gillard is not a pathological liar, & would have kept her promises, if she actually been in power. If she had, we would have an entirely different position now. I liked a number of her policies, but you can't vote for someone who is a proven liar.

We all know Rudd is a pathological liar, his whole construction of what he wants to appear is a lie. He makes Gillard look like a paragon of virtue.

However, if we elect a government, we have given them a mandate to carry out their policies, & I most definitely want them to do just that. The last thing I want is a bunch of clowns, like the Greens, & the Democrats before them, second guessing the elected government, & preventing them carrying out their policies. To have independents of really unknown value in the mix is stupidity incarnate.

You complain about workchoices, but it was a perfect example of good government. Those in power went too far, & got chucked out. That is how it should work. Not have a bunch of ratbags, with only 10% support controlling policy, & perhaps saving that government.

It is a pity that we have only one party any thinking person could entrust with our government.

Unfortunately I expect when the Libs get a look at the real situation of our finances, they will have to break promises, & depending how they do that could make them hard to trust in future.

"......when the Libs get a look at the real situation of our finances..."

That's already plain, Hasbeen, as Treasury has revealed all. More is the question of whether we get to look at the Libs "real situation" instead of the absolute bulldust we're getting and the avoidance of Treasury's scrutiny. Abbott was a disgrace at Rooty Hill and it saddens me greatly that this stage-managed, Murdoch-manipulated muppet appears likely to be our next PM.

IYGYKHN. Is it yet too late for Malcolm?

You bet it is. Turnbull got a shot & stuffed it up. He is too thick for any real job.

As a Rudd clone, & not a very good one, he would spell the death of the Libs.

Most people I know who will give Abbott would never vote for Turnbull.

Well,

We have just seen fraudulent or crooked Kevin, with the claim of a $10bn black hole in the coalition's costings being exposed as a fraud by Treasury. Or is this another beat up by the Australian and Fairfax papers?

"Treasury has been subjected to a lot of ridicule and criticism from the Coalition over costings and budget forecasts. But last night Treasury head Martin Parkinson and David Tune at the Department of Finance signaled a line had been crossed.

Two of the nation's most senior public servants had been placed in an impossible position by Labor's willful misuse of confidential briefings. They had to act. Stepping out from behind the normal veil of government, Parkinson and Tune did precisely what strong public servants should do in the caretaker period - calling out Labor's misrepresentation for what it was.

Kevin Rudd now faces the biggest crisis of the election campaign - on an issue of truthfulness, trust and economic competence - after Treasury, Finance and the Parliamentary Budget Office exposed the government's politically fraudulent and desperate attempt to frame Tony Abbott for a "$10 billion fraud". "

This is clear proof that Rudd is unfit to govern, and Chris Bowen and Penny Wrong, who participated in this fraud, are unfit to work with Treasury and Finance.

shadow..the costings..issue is very revealing
if you..*know..it will be an issue..[ie hidden/believable numbers]
naturally..you get the best opinion..you can..and lab did

the numbers used..are indisputable..depending upon..whether you..use the predictions..or the actual*..income received[the treasury corection'....only points that out][they were a best guess..in lue of the lib..costing/numbers...both sides are playing games.

BUT more importantly..these servile beurocrats..seem to give-out divergent..numbers[that seemingly always are wrong..for some reason]..

lets not forget..they..[the beuro/rock-rats..may just have their own..*adgendas..[their own reasons for spinning the number's]

regardless..we know..the libs didnt give their numbers
we know why..but thats why lab made the best guess[and got shafted..]

or maybe set up..by their servants..
WHOS SHOULD CLEARLY HAVE STATED..the parameters..
upon which..their best guess..was based on..

either..ALWAYS..using both*..of the POSSIBLE rubbery numberings..OR USING A CONSISTENT..but true number..

i would vote neither of the main parties
but we cant..so i feel..vote lib..in lower..lab in upper..cause their both rotten to the gore core.

liars/lackeys/layabouts and lazy..
the lot of em*