The Forum > General Discussion > FARMERS NOT BEING TOLD OF
FARMERS NOT BEING TOLD OF
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
You're saying: "Theres no reason Australia can not be the front of a billion dollar Halal Meat and vegetable Industry and the farmers would be the winners. The Sheep Council of Australia have agreed to meet with us. Whats wrong with the rest of you?"
The answer I believe, is that there is nothing wrong. If there is an untapped market and superior profits to be had from an alternative to live exports, the farmers will be happy to adopt other exports instead.
You seem to be indicating that there is a conspiracy to continue the live export trade which is why your views aren't being heard.
This is an argument I tend to have a problem with. I would need a strong motive... as it stands, you are complaining that the farmers federation are supporting a producer in order to continue the practice of live exports... the thing is, the only reason I can see for them doing this, is if live exports are profitable.
You need to give me a convincing reason as to why the farmers groups are supportive of live exports and are doing their utmost to continue the trade, if in fact, it isn't profitable.
Yabbys posts explain the situation without this gaping hole - yours don't. It may simply be that in your zeal for this particular cause, your threads don't sound objective and your message is valid but clouded. In any case, I would need better explanations for why farmers groups aren't embracing new markets, when conventional wisdom suggests they would.