The Forum > General Discussion > Religion do we need it?
Religion do we need it?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- ...
- 50
- 51
- 52
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Can you help me interpret Belly's words?
They are like the Greek oracle (sometimes even like the bible) - one can interpret them any way they want.
<<My reference was to all who follow a God>>
Well, everyone follows God, even the butchers and the bakers - some do it consciously others not, some believe so, others not, but ultimately that's the direction we're all heading to, whether or not we've ever seen or heard about a church or a synagogue or a mosque or a temple.
Belly's use of the word "follow" can be read either as "all who approach (come behind) God", or "all who worship (serve) God", but the later is not the same as worshiping a deity because God isn't a deity; or it could be read in a dozen other ways.
He then turns to tell us about abuse by Muslims, etc. - of course if that's what he means by "religion" then we don't need it, but then he could just the same refer to the pie which was burnt in the oven and came out overcooked as "religion", then claim that it's something we don't need.
I wish God knew what Belly means, but I'm afraid He doesn't.
As for the writing of others, the idea came to me that perhaps several people here are mixing up the Abrahamic model with religion. These are not the same of course, but perhaps it's that idea as if they were which got stuck in people's minds. In that case, it can then be fruitful to have here a discussion titled: "The Abrahamic model, do we need it?"