Excellent point, Houellie.

I can't help but luxuriate in the sheer poetic justice of Jones' predicament. Here's a bloke that's made a mint out practicing precisely the behaviour that is now being inflicted upon himself...and he provided the ammunition!

And we shouldn't make too much of his sexual preferences. After all, as Belly mentioned above, Freud apparently wore petticoats - as in the renowned "Freudian Slip".
Doesn't seem to have done his reputation much harm : )

SM something from one of your own, or is he?

Alan Jones has got "a dose of his own medicine" from an online campaign encouraging sponsors to leave his program, coalition communications spokesman Malcolm Turnbull says.

Mr Turnbull said on Monday the 2GB radio host had not been the victim of cyberbullying as Jones claimed but new media had allowed thousands of Australians to speak up "unedited and unmediated".

Just shoring up his left wing supporter base. Why the guy doesn't just join the Labor party already I'll never know. He's a national hero on the leftie Herald today, they lap him up.

H fully aware what you meant and must say I agree with every thing you said.
The lines you referred SM to came from one of my links,was part of it.
And just as you said AJ has been hit between the eyes, with his own past tactics.
I could have posted from the anti Jones list a video of him insulting the Heralds reporter, she did not deserve that .
I understand too your views on the increasing concerns for women, no not when it is justly so.
And far from anti women, far far from it.
But a few get away with murder, because they are women.
Just want to underline, cherry cheeked AJ is no victim.
A big mouth grub? yes.
Victims no.
Shock jocks are mostly the bloke we aviod down the club as a pain in the neck, ranters.
But this one has nice pink roller skates and is hard to avoid.

H,

Please refer to my previous post:

" If the action was legitimate protest such as the face book "petition" that 100 000 "signed" and threatened boycotts then the left could claim the moral high ground."

This was essentially what AJ was calling for. At no point did he organise for abusive phone calls, e mail jamming or other such action.

So again I say "So those opposed to AJ think it is perfectly for OK to phone the sponsors of 2GB and scream and swear at the receptionists, and repeatedly call to jam up the phones. To send thousands of spam e-mails to disrupt the sponsors etc."

Obviously the left are prepared to lower themselves to AJ's level and far lower.

It seems as though now, Jones was repeating comments about gillard's father he heard from another source.
Ammunition for the mouth-piece of the liberal camp.
It is becoming apparent someone else is making the bullets for Jones to fire. Where would this sort of language come from