Poirot, I missed this coming up, what is ACMA's argument about ?
I read the link you gave. Is it an argument about decimal places ?

What is the real figure ?
This seems extraordinary if that is what it is about.
I know from personal experience that ACMA can be pedantic but if I take
the ABC at face value, a course in science might be more appropriate.

Belly

She has been dragged about every mud heap, BECAUSE SHE LIES!

Poirot, I went looking into it and found a statement made by
Alan Jones on the ACMA matter.
All it was about was that in one broadcast he said the amount
of co2 in the atmosphere cause by humans is .001%.
In previous and later broadcasts he used the correct figure 3%.

In the discussion, a different figure of .001% for another measurement
was used.
He simply got them mixed up in his mind on that one occasion.

Here is his statement, I think you should listen to it and then come
and tell me if you think the whole thing is anything else than a
government attack.

http://www.2gb.com/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=14735

I am not usually a conspiracy nut but if this is
an example I think I will join Arjay's club

Bazz that may be your best bet.
To even consider this INDEPENDENT group are setting Jones up?
Sorry bloke unbelievable.
You may be interested in some breaking news.
This days English Telegraph, or was it Gardein?
Petrol from water?
True extraordinary story.
15 years away from mass production but making some right now.

Well Belly, don't tell me you believe conspiracy theories on the
suppression of the method of running cars on water ?

Every one of those ideas I have seen fail on ERoEI.
More energy input for what you get out.

I am still waiting for cold fusion.

Re ACMA, well yes but look who is running it now, Julia's left hand !