Weather events are getting increasingly violent.
Something to do with ocean temperature.
There's a fair chance drought will return to the Eastern side of AU.

Hasbeen,
Two popints.
First of all you said, 'hamonogised'? I don't even know what that means.
Sounds like the title for a Pedro Aldomovar movie.
Second, you said,'corrected and otherwise falsified'. You don't think that's seems, well, a tad oxymoronic?
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au

One of the AGW reports was that the number of Hurricanes in the US
had increased. Thw wx bureau reported that it was no so. In fact there
had been less.

If I went to 9 Doctors and each one did independent tests and all said that smoking was causing me health problems and that if I did not stop, the problems would get worse.

I then go to a 10th Doctor and he says the others are all wrong, that they are only testing me for my money and that I should continue to smoke.

Furthermore if that 10th Doctor is being paid by a cigarette company then who should I believe?

Perhaps I'll just light one up now while I consider the problem.

Dear Bazz,

One of the denier's reports was that the number of Hurricanes in the US
had decreased. Thw wx bureau reported that it was no so. In fact there
had been more.

Geez, that was easy.

Next.

Dear has been,

I too studied this stuff for a couple of years before landing on the stance I now have. Natural scepticism is really important. The danger we fall into is having adopted a particular position we often vigorously defend it well past its merits.

It is very easy to present stuff that supports one's position but a hell of a lot harder to shift someone else's. That is how it should be. So if I'm told by a person they have damning and irrefutable evidence that my particular stance is wrong then it needs to be at least of equal weight and veracity to that which solidified my thinking in the first place.

Naturally if the only thing that person furnishes is vitriol and cries of 'Scam' then they deserve short shrift.