csteele, I wasn't going to say it, but I'm afraid I must. You see mate, you need help. Your statement that you are not prepared to listen to Andrew Bolt shows this. It is facts, not who said what that matters.

Granted I find Bolt grates a little, but I'm interested in the facts he exposes.

It is an academic trait, the cause of many major mistakes, that they are more interested in who said something, rather than what was said. The continual deference to authority leads to the unexamined acceptance of much garbage.

The climate gate Emails have proved that our so called climate scientists have no interest in the truth. Nobody other than the feeble minded, who has read just a couple of dozen of them could ever take anything they pronounce as anything but garbage supported only by contrived, tortured & simply made up data.

This leads me to believe that you have avoided reading them, or are prepared to use anything to promote your interest. Tell me, are your interests financial, or is it a green god that leads you. If you have not seen the hundreds of cases of false data used by the IPCC, found by so many people, it can only be that your eyes are locked shut.

In a decade or so we'll have forgotten about the "Coal Barons" and be railing against the "Green Barons", AGW is about money and power, when vested interests find a way to monopolise renewable energy generation they'll divert people's attention with some other scam.
I'll take any bet that in years to come there will be legislation pushed by the power companies to limit or outlaw private, backyard energy generation and solar panels or turbines will be restricted and only rented out to households.

Dear Hasbeen,

Not raising this again are we? Streuth laddie, don't you ever learn?

Just to get this straight, you want me to take the word of a person our own legal system has described as “…at worst, dishonest and misleading and at best, grossly careless.” over a group of scientists who were subjected to 9 separate inquiries and completely exonerated?

Then on that basis chuck out any notion of Global Warming?

Anybody who would do that would rightly be labelled as delusional. And you then have the hide to claim I'm the one needing help? 

Sheesh!

well I suppose csteele could listen to Flannery who predicted empty dams in Sydney and Melbourne as well as a number of other idiotic predictions. And then theirs the great evangelist Al Gore who has made millions by telling lies. How dare any journalist question these prophets.

Steely I want you to take the word of your gods. The words they wrote in those emails. The ones that tell us in their own words, that no shonky business is going too far in their quest for their goal.

Have you ever read them, or aren't you game?

Dear runner,

You said "And then theirs(sic) the great evangelist Al Gore who has made millions by telling lies."

Well you and your lot should be able to pick them my friend.

Remember the most powerful evangelist pastor through the Bush presidency one Ted Haggard. Married with five children, stridently anti-homosexual but caught doing drugs off a gay prostitute's arse.

But tell me runner, how has Al Gore made millions for himself off the fight against GW?