Dear runner,

“to silence those who show how much fantasy they believe in”

Lol.

Are you trying to do my work for me? Punctuation is a marvellous thing if you don't want to end up with egg on your face.

Through this thread I have had the guilty pleasure of adopting the 'Right back at cha!' style of reply.

I mean 'false religion', 'con men', 'ratbag greenie', 'greenies fevered brow' were delivered in the first four posts. You lot set the tone pretty quickly.

And what made you think that after bringing the phrase 'baby killers' into a debate on climate change you didn't deserve to cop something about child abuse within the church?

If you consider I'm playing unfair then look to you own 'mote' brother and clean up your act. I will respond accordingly.

But I do have to tell you the amount of whinging that has gone on from not just yourself when I have served some of your own medicine back is pretty unbecoming. It is what bullies do and doesn't reflect well on any of you.

What with all the hot air just from these posts alone global warming must have increased this week.
Get over it, accept it, you can't change it.

jayb re read your post referring to me and runner, are you telling me after reading my post you think I am a believer?
Runner I find you no Christian.
And got a grin out of the fa#$ting Dinosaur, see it existed about two hundred million years before your God was invented!
The noises coming out of the deniers here should warm the planet by two more points.
How, in 50 years will they hide the silly ideas and thoughts they hold to today.
Man is impacting on climate change,reducing our impact is the right thing to do.

Yeah ssh jayB, your spoiling the weeks entertainment:)
The education board must finding its employees at the bottom of my cocco pops box.....maybe I might get lucky one day and find a free PHD or a uni equivalent.

Now runner and friends, the on-flight movie is showing its credits and all the pop corn is gone.

Thank you.

cc

I go away for a couple of days and what do I find when I get back:
Plant, having not stopped stuffing himself on Coco Pops since the thread opened,is now suffering the symptoms of sugar overload.
Belly, is still reading from Peter Garret's old Climate Minister press releases (pretty soon he’ll get up the part which talks about six metre sea rises in our lifetime), and
Poirot missing her usual partner, Bonmot, for her Abbot & Costello routine,has co-opted his understudy CSteele.

CSteele you have missed the point of Jay’s article. Which is the symptoms that we, or rather you, have been lead to believe are SPECIFIC to AGW were apparent long before the late 20th century warming kicked in.

This fits in well with the skeptics contention that the Earth has been warming since the Little Ice Age --but it does not fit well with the fashionable hypothesis that everything started to come apart about 1975.

As for your prepubescent pillaring of the link because you detected an additional line about the sea rising . The aim of the article was illustrate that species were extending their range towards the equator, and the seas have been rising long before it became fashionable to notice –see graph:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/sea-level-rise.htm

So ,in conclusion, it is NOT an error in Jay’s article/citation.
IT IS an error in your understanding.

Belly,

No 'highest maximums' over the past decade at all in today's weather details, in none of the eight capital cities. Not even from the 'heat island' effect <:(

But of course, that's how it is reported in the Murdoch paper, that notorious lick-spittle of capitalism >:(

Have a nice day,

Joe