The Forum > General Discussion > Return of Kevin Rudd would be beneficial
Return of Kevin Rudd would be beneficial
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 5 November 2011 8:16:26 AM
| |
my assessment of the Whitlam era....massively under estimate Gillard
thinker 2, The country still hasn't recovered from the Whitlam era. As for our present PM I can only suggest you speak with the victims of her Government rather than political analysts of academic background. Already forgotten the batts & cattle export have we ? Posted by individual, Saturday, 5 November 2011 9:37:08 AM
| |
Satire, no just my honest truly held view.
I am hearted, true, that I truly think the worse detractors of my ALP are not basing their views on understanding. While I often charge head n t my own side, they would never consider doing that. I am reminded some comments come from a lifetime of getting it wrong. This much is sure. One day the real Tony Abbott/his few solid Cabernet supporters, will be uncovered. He is far worse than even Gillard, big call. If that day was today, if Abbott's mask fell and he with it, if polling switched around. Labor could still never win, with Gillard. Two second grade leaders, one goes the other must. We then must ask why it took so long. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 5 November 2011 9:41:30 AM
| |
Dear rehctub,
I agree that there is a growing sense of frustration that real people are being ignored at the expense of established interests. This includes young people - which the "Occupy Melbourne," and other protests show. Unsurprisingly conservative commentators have been frothing at the mouth. As far as Qantas is concerned I suggest that you read the following article. It may put things into perspective: http://newmatilda.com/2011/11/01/naked-conflict-between-profits-and-wages Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 5 November 2011 10:08:25 AM
| |
Two second grade leaders, one goes the other must.
Belly, correction there, one is proven but the other is only suspected so, I'd rather give the unproven the benefit of the doubt. Posted by individual, Saturday, 5 November 2011 10:41:08 AM
| |
That is the thinnest reasoning for electing someone PM of Australia that I have ever heard Individual.
What you are saying is, that the most compelling reason for electing Abbott as PM is, because we haven't tried him yet. I don't think that is enough Indi. Posted by thinker 2, Saturday, 5 November 2011 12:59:17 PM
|
"Lying to the electorate on the eve of an election makes the democratic process a sham."
Ah....unless you devise a cunning plan which separates your promises into tantalizing entities known as "core" and "non-core".