Stg your comments are just trying to distract people from the reality of http://www.ae911truth.org/ Almost 1500 Architects and engineers + 11,000 other under graduates and supporters.These people are laying their careers and reputations on the line in the persuit of truth.

*Stg your comments are just trying to distract people from the reality*

Not so Arjay, the point is that you claimed crap, admit it.
You also tried to use Jason Burke and his name in the process.

According to Jason Burke's book, Al Qaeda means base or foundation.
Not a word about it meaning toilet.

But keep dreaming up your consipiracy theories, we expect no less
from you. Sadly your information is about as reliable as that
toilet, as the evidence shows.

Yabby you and your ilk are arguing yet again semantics.This is your one and only holy grail in the realm of truth.If as you say Al Qaeda are a loosely amalgated cabal of disaffected Muslims,then how could such a disparate group pull off such a complicated event such as 911.

I have met Prof Niels Harritt who is the leading spokes person for a team of nine international scientists.Dr Frank Legge is the Aust rep of this group.They have presented a peer reviewed paper which no Western Govt will acknowledge nor dispute,that shows nano thermite a highly sophistocated explosive was used in all 3 buildings of the WTC.

So Yabby,don't pervey your lies and deception here,lest you too become part of their demise.WW3 is not far away unless we all face the truth.

*then how could such a disparate group pull off such a complicated event such as 911.*

Err Arjay, unless you are not the brightest, then 911 can hardly
be called so complicated to organise. The outcome was perhaps
complicated, but the planning was pretty straight forward.

I remind you that Zawahiri is a surgeon. I remind you that Khalid
Scheikh Mohamed, the main planner, is in fact an engineer.

So tell me Arjay, what was so complicated about 911, that it was
beyond an engineer with money to organise over a many many months?

Yabby ,you and Pericles have failed to confront the forensic science of 911.Explain how concrete reinforced steel buildings collapse as if they have no structural integrity? The anomiles abound,but you have no explainations.

You harp on about Jason Burke but he says on this video that Al Qaeda has not the capacity portrayed by the USA.So how does a loosley arranged gang of angry men pull off the most sophistocated terrorist attack in our history? Look closely at the BBC video Yabby.I know it sticks in your gullett

I have to say, arjay, that I am delighted that you once again whipped out that old nugget: http://patriotsquestion911.com/

As I pointed out last time you brought it to our attention (and as you ignored), the bulk of numbers is somewhat watered down when we take a look at just how 'scientific' the testimonies there are.

When we take out the '300+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members' whose expertise is based entirely on the fact that they survived or knew someone who survived (I once survived a car crash, but that doesn't make me an expert on automotive engineering), the numbers dwindle a bit.

When we take out the '200+ Artists, Entertainers and Media Professionals' whose expertise is no greater than yours or mine (it's worth noting that the first entry is Charlie Sheen, whose credibility is at an all-time low), they go down further.

We can also discount the vague motherhood statements of many of the medical professionals, who show doubt but don't explain their doubt; my all-time favourite, however, is John Lear, the pilot who declares that it is impossible for an experienced pilot - let along a novice hijacker - to crash into a building on his first attempt. The fact is, a plane crashed into a building without having to go around and around making several attempts. Many, many eyewitnesses saw it happen. There is video footage of it happening. There are two missing planes and lots of missing people. It happened. Whether or not the planes brought down the building is immaterial here: the pilot's testimony is bogus. He says something couldn't happen. It happened.

The science on the site leaves a lot to be desired.