Jewely,
Seems to be problems whether the kids are instatutionalised or placed in foster homes. I have no experience in this so will not comment, except that I hope you can achieve an improved outcome. Stay strong and persistant.

Quantumleap,
Your first post indicated that you thought the issue funny, how come?
Next you claim that gays do not root children!

What then do you call those males that abused the little boys in boarding schools and childrens homes? They are homosexuals and peadophiles without any doubt.

Clearly some homosexuals abuse children as do some hetrosexuals, so stop trying to paint gays in a better light.

Jewely:

...I think your position posits itself as accusing religious organisations as being untrustworthy. That is a very, very long bow to draw. The Church is not in a “sector” doing what it wants at all. In this case it is a child protection agency which is fully accountable to the appropriate Government authorities of child protection. It is ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

...You also suggest it lacks worth, since it refuses to deposit children into the hands of sexual deviants; (into the hands of homosexual couples). The church has every right to a particular view on Christian morals of the moment. That “moment” amongst Christians is in a state of flux, since not all religions adhere to that position. For example the Anglican Church has openly gay clergy and women priests. So under your moral judgment, they would qualify in making you feel happier about the churches position in dealing with gays.

...But not all religions take the same view as the Anglicans; and neither should any moral position be imposed by the state on religious groups, as would be the case if forced to abide by anti discrimination laws now current.

lol...carm your farms...just string the pot so to speak:) OUG and you can talk about posts that people ignore...lol...thats rich! As soon as I saw the title.....lol....I just pissed myself laughing...( its like people haven't figured it out with some priests and they still go to church..lol ! I thought my first post with Morgan would of given it away, but I guess not...lol ...And banjo....your spot on! Yes it would be bad to be-little gays would,nt it:) Look......if lot cant see the funny sides to it all, thats not my fault.

Personally......I dont trust any humans period! and all you lot have managed to do, is to confirm what I just said. WOW! Spread the paranoia to the point where all parents, gays, teachers, business people/professionals/that are involved with children/ church officials/ and the lists seem to go on forever..lol...

Folks.....I,d lost faith in human society a long time ago. And from what I,ve seen in my life-time.....it wont be back any-time soon.

Well done and thanks for proving my point:)

Society! The big winner.....lol...if only you could see yourselves:)

Have a great day.

LEAP

Woops..."clam" your farms!

LEAP

Cheers Banjo. I try, mostly I fail.

Yes they are a sector Dan and yes they do deviate from what government does and are merely accountable to a failing and exhausted government department.

I guess sexual deviant is correct according to my spell checker thing. Not sure what that has to do with parenting though. Remember the NSW coalition members support their members that do recruit gay peoples as foster parents. Money being mightier than imposed morals.

“But not all religions take the same view as the Anglicans; and neither should any moral position be imposed by the state on religious groups, as would be the case if forced to abide by anti discrimination laws now current.”

You believe religious groups can hold a moral position and impose it on the state? Oh - hahaha... look who I'm asking.

Possibly in the past that was true to some extent Otokonoko. Perhaps future tender processes will be more detailed as far as expectations to offset those areas where there may be discrimination.