The Forum > General Discussion > Droning on and on and on...
Droning on and on and on...
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Page 34
- 35
- 36
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
The military is in many ways just like a corporation. A corporation's mission statement is to maximise profits for their shareholders end of story. They will use what ever means allowable by law to achieve this even if there is a social cost. It is up to us the citizenry to limit the cost to our society by imposing limits on their behaviour.
The military also has a mission brief, victory by what ever means allowable. However through the history of war it is not the military that makes the rules about what is deemed allowable but we the people. Our representatives sign in our name treaties for prohibitions on chemical and biological weapons, prohibitions on land mines, prohibitions on cluster bombs, the treatment of prisoners etc. In democracies our military, on the whole, abide by those treaties.
All these measures came about because people stood up and said if war is going to be conducted in their name then a standard of behaviour must be observed.
The argument could be made that by turning men and women into killing machines to do our and our government's bidding we have to curb some of their innate morality. It is the duty of the rest of us that we give some moral guidance to the way we want our warriors to fight for us. They may not like it at the time but it has many benefits not only for the way we view ourselves and our nation but also on how well those who have fought for us can reintegrate into our societies.
Some like Timothy McVeigh didn't make it. There is something very chilling in his recounting of being ordered to shoot surrendering Iraqi troops in the first gulf war.
This thread is me saying the use of drone attacks by the secret service of our ally, in a country we are not at war with, is unacceptable behaviour especially when civilians are targeted.
Thankfully there is a growing movement that agree.