The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > The real reason for the NRL group sex 'scandal'

The real reason for the NRL group sex 'scandal'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 75
  7. 76
  8. 77
  9. Page 78
  10. 79
  11. 80
  12. 81
  13. ...
  14. 91
  15. 92
  16. 93
  17. All
Anti:”As it happens, the only contact I've had with DOCS was when they called me in to tell me that my ex's new boyfriend's ex-wife had made a complaint about her. The complaint was ridiculous and I told them so.”

Oh that does suck aye, could have caused a huge amount of grief.

“Jewels, you asked why I'm sure the sock-puppet is a sock-puppet. My suggestion is to look at the first post she made, which was solely an attack on antiseptic, not for the post, but in general.”

Yeah but lots of people did have the same sentiment about your first post. Ya know what though. I had a DoCS allegation against me and the person claimed (well lots of stuff) but one was that I was 5 different people on this other site. Was all found to be untrue, I can type fast but not fast enough to be 5 other users.

Graham would know wouldn’t he? The IP thing gives it away?

“Remember, that was her very "first" post. Ask yourself how many 81 year old men use phrases like "antiseptic dude" or "men's collective". Note that there is no attempt to discuss the subject, other than to create a flurry of strawmen to derail the discussion, with the Pomeranian, whistler and poor dim Sancho adding to the crows chorus.”

Anti are you being ageist?[grin] Must say if I had got spewed on by so many at one time I probably would have kinda disappeared. Just recently I left a site – is hard for me being on anti-DoCS sites, very emotional parents who find me an easy target.

Anti I’ll tell you something – a Judge in Ch-Ch stated in court that the rates of child support were wrong and that hopefully Australia will realise and soon after NZ will also change.
Posted by The Pied Piper, Monday, 3 August 2009 7:12:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Master, "Thanks CJ for informing me that Cornflower is female. That explains why she has no knowledge of scouting - - - - - it's obvious she's had no involvement."

You only take your foot out of your mouth to put another one in don't you? You must be the only person in Australia who isn't aware that Scouting does not discriminate on gender (or anything else). Here you go from the Scouts Australia site:

"28 million Scouts… 160 countries worldwide… Scouting is for anyone aged from 6 to 26 who wants to have fun and learn how to “Be Prepared” for life."
and
"With an emphasis on peace, education and understanding, Scouting transcends all cultural, religious, racial, political, age and gender barriers."

Just check the photos: http://www.scouts.com.au/

You are a complete idiot aren't you. Pages of your posturing and protesting, then you put your foot in it simply by opening your mouth.

Now that is resolved against you (yet again), what about those rather large pastoral holdings of yours that you claimed but don't want to discuss? Have you found out yet what 'stock' you are running and how many head? 'Fess up, that is BS too isn't it and so is your claimed university degree.
Posted by Cornflower, Monday, 3 August 2009 9:06:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
AGAIN, Cornflower has displayed her lack of knowledge about scouting.

Her ONLY reason for her above diatribe is to DISCREDIT. She's purely and simply a TROLL now within this thread.

Scouting has HISTORICALLY been a *BOYS* movement. Girls in modern times ONLY are involved in scouting. Girls have traditionally been "Girl Guides" and from about 1995 or 96 "Guides". Guides remain exclusively girls, which I think is a good idea as it has historically been successful.

As it says here in the history of the Guides http://www.guidesaus.org.au/page.php?pageid=26 "the man was Robert Baden-Powell and the idea was SCOUTING FOR BOYS. It was taken up by girls as well as boys, so he handed the girls over to his sister Agnes, and the GUIDE MOVEMENT HAD STARTED ITSELF".

Sooooooo, my little uninformed Cornflower, the BOYS joined the Scouts and the girls joined the GIRL GUIDES - - - - decade after decade after decade after decade etc etc etc etc.

Now, here in the History of Aussie Scouting http://www.scouts.com.au/main.asp?iMenuID=665 it says "Scouting had become established as the most successful scheme for the training of *BOYS* and it spread rapidly worldwide because it was what *BOYS* wanted to do".

Now Cornflower, girls were only admitted to Cub scouts and Scouts section in 1988.

Cornflower in her COMPLETE ignorance (and because she ONLY gets her scouting info from the *INTERNET*) makes absolutely NO MENTION WHATSOEVER that Scouting for ALMOST IT'S ENTIRE HISTORY was for BOYS ONLY. She obviously doesn't know that.

She went to the internet, found a site which showed that girls can now become scouts, and ASSUMED it had always been that way.

AGAIN, Cornflower IGNORES my PROOF about the term "Scout Master" and REFUSES to answer my 2 questions about her shared belief with Antiwomen that I am really a CSA government employee with the initials of JW who has had official, in person contact with Antiwomen and who as a result is pissed off with Antiwomen , and has then come here onto this site, under many different identities, in order to harass men and harass Antiwomen.

Troll on Cornflower.
Posted by Master, Monday, 3 August 2009 10:31:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I thought Cornflower was a bloke. Either way it doesn't matter. (A dunce by any other name would be the same, sorta).

Master and Jewels, just FYI - when I first started posting Antiseptic kept posting that I was an American feminist who'd infiltrated this site to attack these fine Aussie gents. There's no reason why one shouldn't nor any law stopping anyone from any country turning up and expressing an opposing opinion (surely it makes no different to the argument anyway - either it can stand or it can't), though why an American feminist would bother remains unknown.

Anyway, the accusations went on and on; presumably the tactic when they can't raise an effective counter-argument and they don't have the personal integrity to concede and moderate their opinion, is to just repeat a lie over and over in hopes of discrediting their opposition.

Now I'm wondering if either of them is in politics.

Btw - Cornflower periodically claims to be impartial - which is clearly absurd. She or he is so attached to Antiseptic they could be siamese twins.

Anyway, just wanted to say that the tactic has been used before.
Posted by Pynchme, Monday, 3 August 2009 10:48:57 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
My personal theory is that Cornflower is Antiwomen's mother, and that she used to engage in a bit of biffo on the sidelines when he played Thugby League as an undoubtedly obnoxious brat.

That's at least as plausible as Antiwomen's truly paranoid claim that Master is some feminist woman who's been stalking him around OLO under various other aliases :)
Posted by CJ Morgan, Monday, 3 August 2009 11:01:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
CJ - laughing with tears.

Too funny!
Posted by Pynchme, Monday, 3 August 2009 11:19:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 75
  7. 76
  8. 77
  9. Page 78
  10. 79
  11. 80
  12. 81
  13. ...
  14. 91
  15. 92
  16. 93
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy