The Forum > General Discussion > For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?
For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Page 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
-
- All
Posted by Q&A, Thursday, 19 February 2009 4:43:51 PM
| |
Antiseptic,
Yes thats right Taryn 'used to' PREPAIR the web sites. She 'prepaired' material to send to the web master. She did this also= herself!= http://freerangefarmers.com/freerange/ =http://consciousevolution.com/onshu/view_signatures.php None of these good people are paid. How dare you critise.! Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Thursday, 19 February 2009 5:06:07 PM
| |
In the interests of truth, credibility, polite communicarions and non-defamatory material (I should add it took me almost no time to find these):-
I have been a member of pale now since 2003 and i was first warned by RSPCA the type of nasty people that would try to stop our work. Posted by TarynW, Thursday, 10 January 2008 1:40:15 AM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=1379&page=0#25741 I have just joined PALE through reading your posts. Posted by TarynW, Tuesday, 29 August 2006 8:50:18 PM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=18&page=0 It is plain as day that Wendy was switching between two different identities well before she was banned. Posted by Pisces, Friday, 13 October 2006 8:35:23 PM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=64&page=0#2564 With it she paid for half a dozen strippers to attend the AWB enquiry and two churches to protest their lack of action. Antje PS watch this space. Some people dont! want you to know the truth Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Saturday, 10 February 2007 4:52:16 PM (Same thread) Well it has become quickly apparent that anyone on any thread that does not agree with them, and dares speak their own mind, is subject to their attempts of intimidation. So I feel that they are a nasty little group, and what are they about? They are unknowns trying to use this forum to gain notoriety. Well they are succeeding, but let me tell you guys, its not going the way you planned it. Posted by Pisces, Saturday, 14 October 2006 4:36:03 PM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=147#2616 Must have thought you stopped that identical post going to the wrong thread? And under the name of benny? Some one with the name of banjo patterson plagiarizing another poster? Nahh Wenny caught out, that’s what it is. lol! Posted by PF, Thursday, 19 October 2006 10:56:06 AM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=147&page=0 RSPCA and pale had similar issues with a lady with IMOP had mental health issues several years ago. Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Thursday, 10 January 2008 10:04:18 AM (Same thread) Nicky Posted by Nicky, Thursday, 19 February 2009 6:29:17 PM
| |
I wont cut out certain farmers from the web page because somebody does not like that person.
Posted by benny_sampson, Friday, 20 October 2006 12:21:10 PM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=70&page=0#3556 OzGirl has been posting under a large number of names, and the other recent offenders appear to be related to PALE. Posted by GrahamY, Monday, 23 October 2006 10:10:06 PM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=70&page=0#3556 Also people should post in their own names. No people should not be allowed to post in nick names. Definitely not. Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Thursday, 26 October 2006 12:00:39 PM (Same thread) Good work pale!! You have now managed to alientate the only person on this forum that ever stuck up for you. Your delusions seem to grander all the time. Posted by PF, Saturday, 17 November 2007 6:37:49 PM (Same thread) Actually PF we dont give a Rats@ what you think to be really honest. Apart from make a few good posts regarding free range pork what else have you done? Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Sunday, 18 November 2007 5:50:29 AM (Same thread) Blimey I just took another look at that picture. I say thats not Glensye is it? And all this time I thought she wasnt listening- Praise Allah! Funny as. Glenyse. After all you used to work for Andrew in the Dems office a life time ago didnt you? Pathetic. Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Sunday, 18 November 2007 8:05:41 PM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=1136&page=0#22246 Your slandering of other animal welfare groups has become tedious. Your malice towards those you regard as your competitors gains you little credibility or assists in anyway to improving the conditions of the animals we are endeavouring to protect. Posted by dickie, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 12:02:22 AM http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=1136&page=0#22246 A bit of cross referencing shows that Macropod Whisperer, Benny_Sampson, PALE and TarynW and others share - on most occasions - the same poor formatting and spelling ...Can we please have the name/address of your lawyers now? Nicky Posted by Nicky, Thursday, 19 February 2009 6:37:56 PM
| |
Nicky, I do agree with you...
I write only under this logon name, have never used another one here... I guess it is hard for GY & Co to police those who transgress this rule, so many points of access through different home and office sites.. I invariably have three or four locations I can use at any time and a huge stock of spare email address I could utilise... but the interesting point would be if someone came here using two with logons and then argued with themselves and drew others in.... It has a perversity which appeals but one which I will not pursue. I get into enough trouble defending the blue corner of the ring with out standing up for the red corner as well... darn it I would likely punch myself on the nose, metaphorically speaking Posted by Col Rouge, Thursday, 19 February 2009 7:13:14 PM
| |
Spikey and TRL
Thank You for at least offering an opportunity to put forth our side without attacking I am not going to bother to read Nicky’s latest garbage. Col I wish you ‘would’ continue your theory of people opening Ids to argue with themselves- We have 5 Ids we know of that we believe is Nicky and her friends... GY again as you know we used to post in PALE in Conjunction with RSPCA QLD and you said all the members could use that tag. “After” complaints Taryn Antje etc asked for their own tags. Nicky`s agenda and her friends as follows-ioop http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,24411799-2,00.html http://leehopkins.net/2007/08/29/rspca-politics-is-not-just-for-politicians/ TRL of course we don’t like bringing in lawyers. Problem is it’s affecting their efforts also. We have been very blessed to have several join as members. They have worked till 3am morning ‘for free’ and paid their ‘own air fairs to meetings. They don’t deserve to read for 3 years that the organisation they have put their names to and work with is dishonest. Nor do we or or other organisations linked to us. It’s a vicious anti get pale agenda. Continued for years. Those of you of course who have debated us and not agreed will use this as an opportunity to put the boot in. I can’t do anything about that. After working united with RSPCA QLD and others we came up with a project to phase out live exports. We needed help in other states for volunteers to greet meeting off shore visitors and introduce to Australian farmers. Also to locate farmers in other states... That’s when the trouble really started. We are of course known as the animal killers. In our opinion and information handed to us we believe Anti Pale people have followed us into OLO to continue their agenda of discrediting us. Nicky will tell you others support reopening abattoirs. I can assure you that are not always the case. We have more than a few letters clearly stating our programme to reopen abattoirs isn’t something they could or would ever support.’ Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Thursday, 19 February 2009 8:16:38 PM
|
OT, but this is the quickest way I can get your attention.
I have just logged on and see that "Col Rouge" and "All-" have logged on "twice".
How or why does this happen? Maybe they have 2 computers and have logged on at different URLs?
Any thoughts.