Oh dear, PALE's telling porky's again. Must be that camel juice...

Forrest, thank you for the very gracious apology over something that was dead and buried long ago. The egregious and dishonest JW and SallyG are, I suspect, the same person, or very closely acquainted. It matters not, since they've "both" scurried off with their tails between their legs. No loss.

I do think that post-deletion is regrettable and that while JW may have had a perfectly valid reason for requesting it (perhaps her husband had got interested in the thread and she didn't want him seeing her comment about him), her behaviour after having done so was not conducive to anything other than the worst interpretation of her motive.

Nicky


Tell you what I will contact the web master and send him a copy of your complaint. Also our CEO . Everybody knows who you are.
How childish and embarresing. Actually because of your posts all over the net since we joined OLO Nicky 'we' suggested to take off the in conjunction off "Several Times"

*The answer was NO please leave it.*

What difference does it make considering we have two other web pages with the information and share a world wide petition.

Antiseptic Dont go getting yourself into trouble . Its very different in saying someone told a porky to a poster under a private Id tage than it is an organisation.- by law.= See below. Dont say I didnt warn you.
http://www.livexports.com/
http://www.halakindmeats.com/

You have picked a very bad time to take a swipe at an organisation Anti. Our lawyers have been in contact with OLO and Nickys going to be invited to court. Then she might see how happy everyone 'really' is with her.
That was also at others request.

I am not trying to be nasty to you Anti. I am simply warning you that other people are watching her posts and you could easily be a innocent victim just be saying something like that.

I have posted the information from our organisation for you so if you wish to continue be it at your own risk.

We have no wish to see others sued.

PALE:"Dont say I didnt warn you"

Oh dear, the girls from PALE are having those delusions again.

Do go ahead dears, I'll have lots of fun. Mind you, it's be better if you simply stopped telling porkies, ISTM. They get so hard to keep track of, don't they?

PALE:"Our lawyers have been in contact with OLO"

I'm sure GrahamY is fascinated. Mind you, I'm still waiting for those lawyers from the last time you had these delusions. As I recall, they were supposed to be in touch about 6 months ago, after I contacted you and gave you my name and address. No doubt they're "very busy"...

For reasons difficult to understand, I have just suddenly come to a realisation that a huge, huge gap exists in OLO's Rules of Engagement for this Forum. Thanks, examinator, for opening a topic within which there has been such focus maintained upon the adequacy, or otherwise, of OLO rules.

This gap has to do not so much with the debate quality degradation potential posed by the problem of the use of 'dual (or multiple) identities', as with the absence of any provision for OLO oversight of literary style. This gap, this no man's land, covers (or fails to, in actuality) the inverse of 'dual identities': the problem of multiple literary styles emerging under the one identity.

I believe this calls for some action on the part of OLO. If my rudimentary German does not fail me (and I am sure Ludwig, you know, Mad Ludwig of Herbaria, can correct it if it does) the organisational structure necessary for achieving this oversight would be known as a 'Geheime Literatische Arbeit Treuer Obersichtstdienst', or, acronimically, a GELATO. I only suggest this structuretitle in what I hope is respectable German because somewhat similar structures (and acronyms) have in the past been found to work in Germany. A free translation might be 'Secret Literary Style Genuineness Oversight Service, or if one must, SLISGOS, although that doesn't have quite the same evocative ring to it as GELATO. I'd stick with the German version; I don't think we want any pale anglo imitation nonsense, or PAIN.

The GELATO would work this way. All registered users of OLO would have access to a new icon in the group of icons that display beneath the timestamp of each post. (This new icon could perhaps take the form of an ancient Indo-European fertility symbol.) When a user thinks they have seen the emergence of a new or different literary style under the same OLO userID, that user simply clicks the new icon, and the suspect post is reported to OLO.

Once a predetermined number of reports accumulates, the GELATO swings into aktion.

TBC

People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming

"You have picked a very bad time to take a swipe at an organisation Anti. Our lawyers have been in contact with OLO and Nickys going to be invited to court. Then she might see how happy everyone 'really' is with her.
That was also at others request.

I am not trying to be nasty to you Anti. I am simply warning you that other people are watching her posts and you could easily be a innocent victim just be saying something like that."

PALE&IF, I know nothing of the ongoing feud between you and Nicky and have no wish to know. Unfortunately though, because you are continually airing your animosity on this forum, it's becoming increasingly difficult for the rest of us to ignore.

OLO is a public opinion forum. It's not a vehicle through which to conduct personal vendettas. These threats you've made here are totally over the top and out of place.

I think you'll soon find that many long suffering OLOers will lose patience with you and start making a few complaints of their own. Take it somewhere else, PALE&IF. I'm sure few here are interested in the petty machinations of your organization

Forrest Gumpp, I think that's an excellent idea. People are able to post in more than one ID if they have access to more than one computer. Graham is aware of the case I have mentioned.

Antiseptic, I am saddened to see that you are to lose your house too (I've been threatened with that on other threads, as have any number of other people).

Bronwyn, you are absolutely right, and for my part in that, I apologise. I just have an overwhelming dislike of pretentiousness, hypocrisy, personal attacks upon, and discrediting people who do not (as far as I know) contribute to these threads and therefore cannot defend themselves. Add to that the venom, vilification, abuse, bullying and empty threats delivered by PALE at every opportunity. Perhaps it is a perversity on my part, bothering to respond.

PALE, please provide the name and address of your "lawyers". I will then provide random samples of the posts in the names of PALE and its alter-egos, many clearly written by the same person, and when they stop laughing (if they have any clues about Tort Law), they will explain, in little words and simple terms, the laws concerning "defamation". I have tried, but it was clearly above your intellectual grasp.

I am not in the least surprised that you have been asked to remove the "in conjunction with..." either.

Insults and abuse work much better if the spelling is ever so slightly correct, they make sense, and you have the background knowledge to state them.

Queensland does not appeal to me at this time of year.

Nicky