(continued from above)

The GELATO, consisting of a jury of OLO users, none of whom are under any disciplinary disabilities imposed by OLO for breach of Forum rules or etiquette, and chosen at random, confer in a private chat room to which they have been given temporary access by OLO for the purpose of making a determination in respect of a particular case of claimed inconsistency of literary style.

The making of such a finding may require of jurors collectively that they concentrate together upon the issue at hand. Almost as if they were attending an electronic digital virtual conference, or camp. A concentration camp, if you will. There, quicker than you could say 'Treblinka', a determination could be arrived at classifying a particular OLO userID as in fact representing an organisation, rather than as simply being a natural person or clever digital android construct operated consistently by the one human intelligence.

A userID once classified as being 'organisational' in nature could then be treated differently by OLO with respect to posting entitlements as compared to mono-dimensional rule-abiding registered OLO users. A little icon could henceforth accompany the userID of such organisationally-classified OLO user such that other mono-dimensional users could know that they could effectively not know with whom they might be debating should they decide to enter the lists: perhaps that icon could be a little yellow star, or something.

A so-classified 'organisational' user could, for example, be restricted to posting only within the General Discussion area of the Forum, and then only upon topics submitted by themselves subject to the normal OLO topic approval processes.

By adopting such an approach, OLO could go a long way toward 'icing' thread-hijacking, and 'creaming' would-be ideologues attempting to pole upon the status of the Forum in their quest for fame. Who knows, the standard of discussion on OLO might improve dramatically, the boredom index decline, and a thousand electronic-paper flowers bloom!

GELATO. Keeping things cool, and OLO free for ideas!

Serving on the GELATO. Doing your levelling best for mass debating, with style.

Graham

Your are aware there are only two organisations A -and B you have already determined that as we all get the same amounts of posts that would be unfair.
A lot of this comes down to ignorance. Remember when someone complained that our organisation had commented on the Rudd Trade China thread.

In they rushed boots and all shouting loudly. What has China Rudd and Trade to do with Live Exports? ( I rest my case )

Another example which I feel even you may have overlooked Forrest is ALP State Government and ALP Federal Government are reasponsible for intensive poultry etc.

Of course the Libs were for ten years in parliment as well before them. So there for nothng was off topic.
Also Graham Young do you recall posting on this forum a year back or more.
That you have assured yourself our organisation works in conjunction with RSPCA QLD. You wrote on the forum you did not want this raised again and you would suspend anybody doing so.

There for On behalf of all of us I would appreciate you doing your job and taking some control over Nickys posts claiming otherwise.
It is an attempt to discredit us.
Graham One Id per person would be best. Outside control of OLO is required. You have got IMO members of Animal groups attacking our organisation by logging on your side using false names.

The AT office as you know is now looking into these types of problems

Forrest Graham Young

May we also draw your attention to the thread referred to please.

It is a FACT the only poster that didn’t go off topic is pale.

We see life story’s of immigration which BTW I approve of. We see jokes, cooking advice, and Nicky going on about half a dozen topics. That would be mostly union rules.
Pls note Graham nobody has complained about that. Foxy who started he thread was using it to post menus. I* pointed out to her it was *off post
So once again what is’ clear is the agenda’ against an organisation made by posters who refuse to reveal their real identities.
As for Nicky’s obsession with Pale working in conjunction with RSPCA QLD Graham
One only has to look at the web site. Not to mention the pictures of the CEO working on our MOU with others.

Now here is something I was reluctant to disclose before knowing Nicky jealousy
Fact All our sites are RUN by RSPCA QLD Paid For and hosted on RSPCA QLDS hosting.- As you know.



So Graham Once again we ask you to enforce your own rules.

You said after letters sent to you from lawyers quote.

I have satisfied myself pale has a relationship with RSPCA QLD

*Do not raise this issue again.*

Well Graham, it’s been raised over and over again. So what are you going to do about it?

Shane made it pretty clear we are not going to put up with it last time. It is a lie and its done to discredit us!

I will tell you we are not going to allow a bunch of nasty extremists posting in bogey names to defame our organisations.

So what I am saying Graham is in fact RSPCA QLD are serious about phasing out live exports. THAT’S why we are here.
I was asked to put this on public record.
Done!

PALE:"Fact All our sites are RUN by RSPCA QLD Paid For and hosted on RSPCA QLDS hosting.- As you know"
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Thursday, 19 February 2009 8:25:59 AM

TarynW:"I as well do the web pages . I do it when I can."
Posted by TarynW, Monday, 30 June 2008 5:56:02 AM

TarynW:"RSPCA QLD pay for the site to be hosted"
"a web master was paid about eight months ago"
Posted by TarynW, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 5:20:43 AM

It appears that the poor dears are all confused again.

It's so hard to keep all the porkies straight, isn't it?

I dislike it with a fiery passion, when people try to pull out the 'lawyer' card to win a debate. I've argued with blatantly racist, sexist and horrifically offensive and insulting individuals here, but I've never felt the need to complain to management or lawyer up. It's especially pathetic when it's pulled out on a regular basis and without grounding.

A proposal was put forth at the beginning of this thread - don't feed the trolls. I suggest we follow it.

The same goes for phantom lawyers.

People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming,

Truer facts plus better logic beat threats of litigation any way you look at it - but especially when you invite other people's opinions. Ideas never hurt anyone. Why such a thin skin, especially when you are perfectly capable of dishing it out yourself?

Credibility is the word that springs to mind. Are you gaining or losing in that respect?