Your thoughts Forrest are as always, illuminating.

Seeing that Examinator's thread has been hijacked innumerable times already, who knows where it will end up. I for one am going to delete it from my notification list, it's just taking up bandwidth now.

CJ, your last para says it all really (but it takes two to tango).

Now PALE, you should be more careful about alluding to things you might not want to come back and bite you. If this is the "second set of lawyers", what happened to the first? Did a runner when they realised what they were dealing with?

PALE "discussing" the matter of FGM:-

And here you are again nicky saying>
“There is nothing "moderate" about FGM. There are degrees in severity, but it remains mutilation. In those countries, female rape victims are often publicly flogged and/or stoned to death, and other miscreants are dealt with extreme severity”

"Pale comments Ooow that ought to help fish relationships.
Well done! Since when was it up to us to tell ME people how to live?"

Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Saturday, 8 March 2008 7:27:32 PM

Note the concern is not about the issue in contention, rather about "offending" Muslim people. I'm not quite sure what fish had to do with it, but that is the quote.

My response was:-

"PALE, I don't think that knowing a handful of Muslim people qualifies you to comment on their behalf, and it's disappointing that you apparently believe that FGM is acceptable.

Posted by Nicky, Saturday, 8 March 2008 11:20:25 PM
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=1547&page=0#29807

What other inference is to be drawn from your comment? Actionable? Get real.

I do not feel the need to resort to abusing Graham Young as you do, or threatening him or other innocent people as you do when you are backed into a corner.

Coward! If you do not want to provide the names and addresses of your lawyers for me to send this and other material to, would you prefer that I send a random sample to Mark Townend at RSPCA Queensland?
Continuing...
Nicky

And this (questionably posted by "TarynW")

"Just for the record, everyone, I just found a letter posted by PALE in August 2007 calling for an "end" to its MoU with AFIC:

"....I would ask you to remove us from your web page and of course consider our MOU at an end.

"It is with regret you chose not to work with us however you leave us without any other choice. On a personal note to you Ikabel I am extremely surprised and very disappointed".

Regards
Wendy Lewthwaite
Posted by TarynW, Monday, 13 August 2007 7:35:23 AM

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=877&page=0#15619

Posted by Nicky, Tuesday, 15 July 2008 8:35:53 PM

Do learn to keep the multiple personalities on the same planet.

Nicky

Nicky

Posted for public record we have had lawyers write to GY about the SAME issue before, because I was asked and advised to.

*That should have been enough for OLO to edit 'without 'more lawyers.*

You just cant go on saying we are lying when we say we are working on a programe with A B or C. That implies our organisation is dishonest. It effects others working with us.It backfires on the Animals. And you DID say we Support @@@ i asked you to apologide and you posted a reply of one word- NO!

The Lawyers Nicky are in seperate firms. Not that its your business. They have both been involved in HKM for a long time and pale rspcaqld.
The person who dealt with this the last time is overseas.
If you want contact he will be here on Sunday or Monday
I have no futher suggestions but I am no coward because we are upfront as to our ID Always!

IMO + others 'you' used other tags.
Regardless,I have actually sat and read our alligations for the first time. The Id tag can be explained very easily.

Graham remember when you contacted us last week and told us to change the Id on a tag- .Then you said no its was right in the first place.
Goodness we didnt even know how to do that. I actually sent a email back to GY so proud when I worked it out.

At the same time you sent one saying No I was wrong leave it.
Perhaps you should explain that to Nicky. BTW we never did sort it out.? So I can honestlty say without changing machines I havent got a clue what Id this is in anymore.

We have Five computers down stairs and two offices up. Each has around 3 to 4 computers. Not to mention people moving them around. Perhaps that explains your huge mistery Nicky.

Be warned if you contact anybody and cause upset which leads to loose of funding someone is going to have to make up that loss.
Be careful

You dig yourself into an ever-deepening hole, PALE. One or more of the multiple personalities you use claimed vehemently that PALE does not raise funds".

I suggest you read the statement you made in response to mine about FGM again (read it slowly so that it sinks in):-

"Pale comments Ooow that ought to help fish relationships.
Well done! Since when was it up to us to tell ME people how to live?"

YOUR statement, not mine, and quite clear.

The number of computers available to you clarifies how you are able to post in the multiple identities, which is so apparent in the language, formatting, grammar and punctuation. Too easy! But so obvious.

Nicky

Nicky

That has 'nothing' to do with our complaint to OLO.
I am only looking at this from a legal point. There are others to also consider, apart from damage to our own.
We have every legal right to pursue you- and anybody whom has not given us the full protection of the laws within this country.
In other words who ever is reasponsible for printing distribution of defamation material dicrediting us that may cause damage to our reputation and in this case others.
OLO have rules are different again and as a seperate complaint we say they are not being enforced.
You do troll flame and you have done so for years. So if the forum doesnt deal with it we must. We have ample examples to demostrate

What would make life easier for all of you and your mates is to understand we are free to work anyway we wish. If we work in conjunction with RSPCA QLD that is entiley our own business.

How many times have you jumped in - and Dickey and all of the others to rubbish PALE and preach about how Animals Australia are the leaders. How many times have you expressed how Gleyse wouldnt give us the time of day etc..

You are free to do so. We are free to respond. I would have liked to have left it in the past but its clear others have their own agenda.

Its one thing in law for people to comment. Free Speach. Another to have organised a public attack on us if you are members and stake holders in another organisation.

This comes under a different heading in law.
I trust you get my drift.