The Forum > General Discussion > Sea Kittens
Sea Kittens
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Page 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- ...
- 46
- 47
- 48
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Absolutaly not. What I gather that you are claiming, is that by
not eating meat, people will reduce the suffering of other species.
In other words, if some species were not farmed at all and had
no life in the first place, the world would be a better place.
Now we also know that millions of people live very sad lives, far
worse then a great many livestock. Would they too be better off
having lived no life at all, as you seem to imply is the case
with free range animals?
For by not eating meat, you are including all farmed animals,
not just factory farmed ones. Otherwise you would have drawn
the line at factory farming, not at eating meat.
As far as the environment goes, once again, what would happen if
all livestock grazing would shut down tomorrow? Much land is
simply unsuitable for cropping and continous cropping is not
very sustainable in the first place.
What would happen is that those grasslands would grow huge amounts
of biomass. In summer, when it all dries out and lightning strikes,
the whole lot would burn, as Canberra found out, when parts of that
city started to burn.
So my point is that free range livestock grazing, if done
sensiblely, is both sustainable and environmentally acceptable,
compared to the options. Eating those livestock is not cruel,
for the other choice is to leave them to the worms to eat, as will
happen to you when you die.