The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > You don't smell too good at times

You don't smell too good at times

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. Page 20
  10. 21
  11. 22
  12. 23
  13. ...
  14. 30
  15. 31
  16. 32
  17. All
So GZ apparently wants somebody else to do his Ouija experiment for him... somehow his claims about "spirits" aren't smelling too good.

<< I would indeed provide objective evidence within my limits >>

OK, so if you're unwilling to do your own experiment to prove your claims about Ouija "spirits", please provide objective evidence for some of your other fanciful beliefs - you know, stuff like Jesus' purported miracles and resurrection - albeit "within your limits".

Please ensure that your evidence is more verifiable and valid than the "lies" told by Mohammed, and on what basis you make that assessment.

<< CJMorgan has not come clean. He failed to address my suspicion he is actually in bed with Islam...(Muslim-by-association; Muslim-in-disguise) >>

I confess. I'm actually an al-Qaeda operative masquerading as an atheist. How did you guess?
Posted by CJ Morgan, Thursday, 1 January 2009 9:44:59 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
CJMorgan,

First, check your comprehension, then read my posts carefully, again and again.

There are already two objective evidence within my limits, staring you in the face.
You have failed to even realise they are there, haven't you??.
(1)...My very own experience. ( I wasn't dreaming, you know)
(2)...One lady who played "Spirit of the coin" in the 70's.
Both experiences are independently verifiable by friends who participated then, hence they are objective evidence.

If Atheists are willing to replicate my experience, I look forward to their findings !!

Do I care about convincing close-minded individual like you?? Absolutely not !!
You can remain ignorant, uninitiated and uneducated, for all I care.

Regarding your request that I provide evidence Jesus is more verifiable and valid than the "lies" told by Mohammed...well, here is a BAD NEWS for you.

Have you forgotten that I dealt with you on same issue on 3/May/2007 ??

Search for this line under "GZ Tan" comments history:-
--> "CJMorgan, It's not that bad- FH's a fool too, albeit a very well-mannered one."
Or click this: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=5742&page=0#79189

It was your turn to provide evidence against Jesus, but you ran off with tail between your legs... Ooop... wasn't that embarrasing??

Like to continue where you left off?? Then, please tell us how is Jesus stories a lie that is same as Mohammed's lies.

Alternatively, here is your BIG opportunity to refute my arguments against evolution, by providing TWO EVIDENCE on evolution, within the narrow limits of your scientific knowledge, of course.
I am counting how quick you can respond with your science knowledge...Clock is ticking...tick...tick...
.
.
.
Sigh... Just like I said, CJMorgan's ABILITY TO LEARN had ceased years ago.
He certainly has not learnt from what I told him about Mohammed's lies, back in year 2007.
Posted by G Z, Thursday, 1 January 2009 11:14:00 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
One Under God! in terms a unionist can understand!
Lets talk about your posts, include GZ,s too, if I sold my movement in the way you try to sell your fantasy's I would be barred from every lunch room in Australia.
The fact is, your view is the minority view, look around the world, every country every religion, yes every one of them.
Can you not see the lower the education the more followers of that religion?
And isn't it clear even to you both that more than one religion exists?
Posted by Belly, Friday, 2 January 2009 5:31:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
GZ,

Me reneging, not at all. I merely do not wish to put Atheists out until there is good reason to do so. Let’s be real here. Ouija boards do not work. The proof would be clear if you attempted to find out my age, height, weight and shoe size even if using people who think they do work. You could do it yourself without anyone else involved.

http://www.museumoftalkingboards.com/Witchboard.html
“Sometimes it is hard to find partners. Is it OK to use the Ouija board alone?”
“Absolutely. Many people have great success using the Ouija by themselves.”

It would be a lot easier if after you make or buy the Ouija board for you to do a quick experiment yourself or amongst people you know. But if you cannot arrange that then send me an email when you are ready through the AFA website and we will work out a time and place.

But you are hardly likely to involve Atheists if the answers are not obtainable by people who actually believe in supernormal/supernatural palaver.

I’m unsure if “Spirit in the Glass” supposedly works the same way as an Ouija board.

David
Posted by Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc, Friday, 2 January 2009 6:51:22 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Adam D,
Evolution is a descriptive term to outline a theory of progression, it is not the power of the progressin. Yet the word is used as fact while it is merely the theory. It is better to use the word mutation of the gene. Then define the examples of mutated genes that have created better adaptation to environment or species roles i.e. monkeys to humans. In the 99.9 % known cases of mutation is is a retrograde step and not an advancing progression. Such being the case the species on Earth are mainly devolving into lesser environment capability.
Prove otherwise!
Posted by Philo, Friday, 2 January 2009 8:02:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
David wrote: "The Catholic faith is one of the carriers of the disease."

David, your statement can be refuted out of hand as your above statement is made without proof. Nevertheless, what I said before still holds true historically, that is, Judaism and Catholicism have produced great culture, arts, cathedrals, hospitals, basic level through to tertiary levels of education and the great universities.
David, I really think you need to have your secualr university fellow post modernists( or perhaps they are just timewarped modernists) apologise to you for providing you with a revisionist and doctored version of history that causes your irrational anti religion ( most likely more hostile to the Catholic religion)prejudices.
Posted by Webby, Friday, 2 January 2009 8:03:57 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. Page 20
  10. 21
  11. 22
  12. 23
  13. ...
  14. 30
  15. 31
  16. 32
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy