William of Young,

No, you give yourself too much credit if you think anything you have stated needed thinking about for a long time. If I don’t post it is because of post limits, other stuff has me being busy or I cannot be bothered replying to rubbish.

And please don’t use quotation marks as though I have made a statement. This seems a complete wast of time to say as the Catholics have made you impervious to logic, but I did not say a god was “pissed off”. I said, “…making sure you don’t piss of your god.” (Should have been ‘off’ by the way) Even though the Old Testament Yahweh is a nasty piece of work by any ethical standards and apparently was “pissed off” on many occasions. You being a Catholic and having never read your Bible are possibly not aware of that.

Please quote where I do not know the difference between ‘murder’ and ‘killing’. And I have no hang-ups about your invisible friend anymore than I have hang-ups about alleged fairies at the bottom of the garden.

You refuse to answer direct questions, mumble on about the infallibility clause of the Catholic faith and generally utter incoherent ideas. Never do you allow your inner thoughts to escape that the Catholic faith is the only true religion and the rest are just wrong. Mustn’t let on about the divisive nature of the RC religion, now, must we. (Think Africa - for starters)

It seems you wish to place yourself in the same basket as ‘one under god’ and ‘Webby’. OK, that’s your choice.

I hope you enjoy your stay in that close proximity with like but dissimilar thinkers.

Yes, and I just see that Philo is another contender for the already bulging basket. “…spiritual being…” and “….bear the image and character of God.” Fancy knowing this without a skerrick of credible evidence and fancy a god only allowing certain people with dubious reasoning ability access to this wonderful information. It’s not fair really! No wonder Atheists feel cheated. :))

Oh well! Suppose we’ll get by.

David

THE a-thiest missquotes as usual>>..the already bulging basket.“…spiritual being…”and“….bear the image and character of God.”..Fancy knowing this without a skerrick of credible evidence>>..

dear A_thiest;..man is created in gods image..[dont add your delusion..'character'..to the end of that definiative statement,..please prove your adden-dumb.

further please prove darwin was an athiest[or declared himself to be one of those delluded types..with belief in evolutionary A-thiesm

darwin quotes..<<Though reticent about his religious views,in 1879 he responded that he had never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God,>>..

..<<In uncharacteristically bold discussions after dinner Darwin asked his guests"Why do you call yourselves Atheists?",

saying that he preferred the word"Agnostic".Aveling replied that"Agnostic was but Atheist writ respectable,and Atheist was only Agnostic writ aggressive".

Darwin responded"Why should you be so aggressive?"...Freethought is"all very well"for the educated,..he argued,..but are ordinary people"ripe for it?">>...

..<<In 1879 a letter came asking if he believed in God,and if theism and evolution were compatible...He replied that a man"can be an ardent Theist and an evolutionist",..citing Charles Kingsley and Asa Gray as examples,

and for himself, he had "never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God".He added that "I think that generally (and more and more as I grow older),but not always,that an Agnostic would be a more correct description of my state of mind>>..

//<<Darwin responded that he could "hardly see how religion & science can be kept as distinct as he desires, as geology has to to treat of the history of the Earth & Biology that of man.—

But I most wholly agree with you that there is no reason why the disciples of either school should attack each other with bitterness, though each upholding strictly their beliefs>>..

yet you and your fellow delusional athiest dorkinsian,god-heads keep facilitating gross distortion and invention upon his name... grasping at ever more delusional strawman inventions to decieve the gullable and ignorant.

evoluttion is not true validatable science ,thus remains a science fraud[a mere theory] and dispirited groundless assumpotions deluding to be a mountain of fact.