The Forum > General Discussion > You don't smell too good at times
You don't smell too good at times
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Page 31
- 32
-
- All
Posted by William of Young, Saturday, 10 January 2009 11:08:38 PM
| |
the athiest<<God’s punishment etc...Now most of these people would not be..intrinsically bad people..but an agreement would not be hard to reach that,..yes,..it is god’s punishment that we are in such a mess..(Pick your own mess)
It is easy to see how undemocratic laws..could be passed to accommodate this..purposed fervour...Once a nation takes that first vital step,..tyranny and its old mate genocide is not far away. They[athiests?]are hardly likely,..especially without 'proper evidence',..to take any kind of political action, which leads to dictatorship. Does anyone really believe that we would create gulags and death camps and throw people out of jobs and country?.. If so, where is the evidence?>> to quote your own reply's from http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2251 <<Allow me to make it crystal clear so there is no confusion. I am saying that the influence of genes and influences on memes produce the ideological positions humans take...It is therefore wise to use reason in establishing if those influences deliver good or bad results and are justified and reasonable...If they are not,..then we must alter the influences.>> <<an even playing field is the way to go...As I have explained,..this does not exist at the moment.>>WHAT YOUR PLANS to correct this LIMITED TO? <<i was also referring to fairness in the way children are educated, as they are future adult members of society and if indoctrinated to think certain unproven propositions are beyond questioning>> <<if anything,..we are anti specific religious indoctrination. Christianity just fits into that description amongst the 20,000 others we reject>> <<I’ve always wanted to change my Biblical name to one more universally acceptable...Then I always come down to the fact that it was a David who sorted Goliath out,..wasn’t it? :)??>> sheds light on this?..these..throw away lines? who can tell http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2251#49145 you sure got the religious ZEAL of the darwinian adgenda's from eugenics to permissive sex education..[even in one previous post threatening me with 're-education']but mate i took that personal. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/books/2004129030_darwinday20.html http://biofractalevolution.com/Malthus.pdf http://www.abebooks.co.uk/products/isbn/9780297643364/Peter-Singer/Natural-Politics-Darwinian-Agenda-for-the-Left/ Posted by one under god, Sunday, 11 January 2009 12:46:21 AM
| |
William of Young,
I rest my case. The absolutes you say you follow are not absolutes at all. Thank you, it took some. David Posted by Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc, Sunday, 11 January 2009 7:16:11 AM
| |
Still no reponse from Porkycrap about his call for the introduction of Christian Sharia law against homosexuals.
Surprise surprise - not. Posted by CJ Morgan, Sunday, 11 January 2009 8:46:55 AM
| |
You spent all dreaming that up to post first thig Sunday morning!
You see God as harsh angry "pissed off" ( your own words). Your atheist position is stuck in the mud in that you refuse to discern the difference between murder and killing and but your poor psychological hangups upon God. Rest you case, if you will. If it helps ease your mind. It is no solution though to your atheist dilemma. Posted by William of Young, Sunday, 11 January 2009 11:59:03 AM
| |
William,
On the Fourt Commandment. Of course the atheists have Biblical religion to thank for giving them a holy day in every seven as a day free from labour to recover our spirituality. Of course they are slaves to an economic system while we take a break from the slavery to reflect on the purpose of our life and destiny. We are freed men - thank God! The Fourth comandment was to remind us we are more than things we posess, we are a spiritual being designed to bear the image and character of God. Posted by Philo, Sunday, 11 January 2009 3:55:47 PM
|
You may remind me about killing. Problem is that you are only looking at the word and not at the context. The context requires definitions and also issues like murder, manslaughter and even killing where it is not murder and so on. In society the Divine law is mirrored whereby not every police officer is charged with murder after killing people eg criminals who are going to shoot others or the cop. You're a smart athiest; work it out.
It is not ‘terrorism’ to kill those with the physical capacity to wreak mayhem with modern weapons such as rockets that come from southern Lebanon or from Gaza. Any nation would retaliate whether they be high tech armed or low tech. Advantage is not part of the equation. Civilians are not killed intentionally as I see you have your mind on the situation in Gaza. In fact civilians are unintentionally killed in many wars since time immemorial. Today we have international agreements but the possibility cannot be eliminated and can be made worse when groups use civilians as human shields and bargaining chips on the altar of world uninformed mob opinion. You don't give two turds about that anyway David, so spare us your atheistic 'sanctimony'.
Don't be sorry. Use the public resources of traditional and magisterial Catholic Faith to learn about alleged gobblydegook.
Say "I" not "we" concerning what you say you cannot understand.
The Church is after all public and its resources, if sincerely sought can help you. Be humble though; not just thoughtful.