The Forum > General Discussion > Another downward step....
Another downward step....
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I once came across this ridiculous website - www.conservapedia.com
It's essentially, just like wikipedia, but for stupid people who can't handle hearing the other side of the story. They consider wikipedia to have a 'liberal bias' even though it's created from contributions from all over the world, and accepts both sides of a controversial issue.
Now, conservapedia on the other hand, selectively chooses what material it selects, so it has a conservative-only approach. It even considers British and Australian spelling of words such as 'colour' (as opposed to the American 'color) to be a liberal bias.
Now, I must confess to a little mischief here - nothing that wasn't in the name of informing the public.
The entry on chastity and chastity pledges makes no mention of the fact that teenagers who have made these pledges do have higher rates of pregnancy and STDs than those who do not.
This is largely caused by the inadequate sex-ed they receive, the fact they can't use condoms and the other forms of intercourse they partake in, without protection.
I made an entry to this end on the chastity pledge - I cited a medical journal, a medical conference, three news articles and some official statistics. If need be, I could probably dig most of them up.
Of course, conservapedia had my additions removed within a matter of hours without explanation.
I guess it just didn't jibe with they way they like to pretend the world must be like.
For some reason, you remind me a little of conservapedia, boaz. Your Christian shang-ri-la sounds rather pleasant, but ignores the hidden ugly side.