The Forum > General Discussion > Are women necessary?
Are women necessary?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I don't mean parthenogenesis or creating synthetic sperm or anything like that (aren't synthetic plants wonderful and genetically superior to the natural plants...ah hell who am i kidding...)
I mean what if our species could enjoy all the evolutionary advantages of sexual reproduction without the need to have women around.
See:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/inconceivable-482509.html
SNIP
Soon, it may be possible for any couple - gay, straight, infertile - to create a baby that carries both parents' genes.
Imagine your street 20 years from now. Your kids may have grown up and left home, but who might be living next to you? It could be a young gay couple and their biological son - created from the vast reserves of frozen, cloned eggs and raised in a lab. The family on the other side may have a healthy daughter, created in the same process when sperm from the father was inserted into a cloned egg created from the original eggs of the now mother.
END SNIP
Gay men wouldn't have to "waste" half their income on their wives needs. They could outbreed heterosexual men.
To the extent that sexual orientations are inherited it may be not the "meek" but gay men who inherit the earth.
On the other hand maybe some remaining heterosexual men will want to keep a few toy girls around to provide sexual gratification.