The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > One Nation already influencing immigration?

One Nation already influencing immigration?

  1. Pages:
  2. ‹
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. ...
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. Page 8
  11. 9
  12. 10
  13. 11
  14. 12
  15. 13
  16. 14
  17. ›
  18. All
Pauline Hanson has shot herself in foot by ignoring the maxim 'never apologise, never explain'. Not giving a toss what opponents thought of her was her best weapon. Now, she will never be left alone by her tormentors. Once you start bothering about what people who will always disagree with you no matter what you say, its over. What she says was right, and she should have stuck to it. No further comment needed.
Posted by ttbn, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 1:29:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hey 15TrillionPaul,

People can survive an still be primitive. But I understand that the aboriginal swooners just need to believe the so-called First People were something they most definitely were not.

People who lived in the Levant for 10's of millennia survived quite well. But until about 20,000 years ago they were primitive - no writing, no pottery, no agriculture, living season to season and being one bad season away from demographic disaster. You know, all the things that the aboriginals were still enduring in 1788.

___________________________________________________________________

"She has apologised for telling the truth about the most miserable"

Not really an apology. It was more along the lines of "if people were triggered by my facts, I'm sorry for that". You know, the same way I feel about 15TrillionPaul...you're uninformed and I'm sorry for that.
Posted by mhaze, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 1:42:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Trumpster,

Well, so YOU say having pottery is a sign of advancement, what if you have no need for pottery? AND you are very successful without it. How does that detract from your "advancement". Oh! the "advanced" European civilisation with their pottery were ready for extinction within two years of arrival. The "primitive" civilisation, the ones with no pottery had to bail the "advanced" ones out, with a silly little thing called food. I know why the Europeans were failing, because they had no internet, primitive people don't have internet!

"one bad season away from demographic disaster" how lucky were they, only one roll of the fickle dice, and it's curtains, yet they survived for 60,000 seasons, just got lucky I guess!

What about the Old Farts, who in a land of plenty rely on aged welfare handouts from others to survive. Not very advanced people, must be primitive if they can't survive without their snouts in the taxpayers trough!
Posted by Paul1405, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 4:05:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Scratch one goon from the public trough. Maybe he can go back to Playschool?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tUbZBTyRhR0
Posted by Fester, Thursday, 17 September 2026 5:40:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi 15TrillionPaul,

If mere survival means that a peoples aren't primitive, which is what 15TPaul is saying, then that means that there are no primitive peoples on earth. So the word primitive has no meaning in this screwed-up thinking of Paul.

When you have to totally redefine the meaning of a word in a moronic attempt by the aboriginal swooners to say the aboriginals were not what we all know them to be, then you've clearly proven the point.

I suspect the logic of that will go flying over Paul's head. But to summarise, in trying to redefine what primitive means he's admitting that the people he is trying to defend were indeed primitive in the standard meaning of the word ie Hanson was right
Posted by mhaze, Thursday, 17 September 2026 8:51:47 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The murder of the unborn is as primitive and barbaric as any other primitive tribe. It leads to women cheering a mother who strangled her 3 children. The natural result of toxic feminism.
Posted by runner, Thursday, 17 September 2026 9:05:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. ‹
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. ...
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. Page 8
  11. 9
  12. 10
  13. 11
  14. 12
  15. 13
  16. 14
  17. ›
  18. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy