Whose running One Nation, so called policy seems to be whatever Gina Rhinoceros says it is! Everyone with half a brain believes an Australian domestic east coast gas reservation policy is vital in securing cheap energy for the country. BUT, not Gina, sorry not Pauline, as One Nation has dumped any pretence of supporting such a policy. A no reservation policy heavily advantages the likes of Gina Rhinoceros who will make huge profits selling cheap Australian gas on the world market. So much for Horrible Hanson and her pledge to "look after" battling Australians. The only battle Hanson is concerned with is where is her next all expenses paid holiday with Gina coming from.

Let's hope One Nation can clear the swamp to some extent in their first term by natural attrition & doing away with non-productive positions for a start. Follow up with a Gap Year National Service & a referendum to keep Australia a Christianity-based Nation ! Actually, the referendum should really be before the 2028 Election !
So-called Christian Australians will need to pull up their socks if they don't want to end up like Europe. There's an ever so slight chance it can be done if the Left supporters can be made to open their eyes & mind !

Pauline Hanson's accurate description of 60 thousand years old and nothing to show for it aboriginal society on a little known podcast was actually expressed a year ago. September 14th, 2025. So desperate is the uniparty to put the woman down, they have to dig up the past - again. The polls show that their contemporary rubbish is having no effect.

Hanson is not the first person to correctly describe the pre-British arrival of aboriginal society being the most primitive in the world, because it was, compared to other ancient societies world-wide. There was nothing recognisable as ‘civilisation’.

The traditional Aboriginal Australia occupied the extreme lower end of the world’s spectrum of material, productive and centralised political complexity. There is a serious case that no other large cultural population was clearly below it.

"No, it is not accurate or fair to describe Aboriginal society as primitive. While early European colonisers used the word because Aboriginal people did not build industrial cities or use metals, modern historians, anthropologists, and archaeologists have thoroughly debunked this view. Instead, they recognise First Nations cultures as highly sophisticated, complex, and deeply adapted to the Australian continent"
AI View.

Again, the racist wants to put First Nations people down based on a European prospective of what is advanced, and what is primitive. If your only measure is what your society has achieved materially, and not the other, then you are going to describe the other as primitive, and yours as advanced. I consider Aboriginal society to be different from that of European, and there cannot be a direct comparison made.

Something of interest;

The Barbarians that sacked Rome considered the Romans barbarians. Germanic tribes, and other outsiders viewed Roman civilisation as a less enlightened society to their own and more as a aggressive, destructive society intent on war and conquest, Roman conquest was savagery to them. The Greeks thought of the Romans as savages, pointing to their pleasure in the staging of cruel mass executions as entertainment. Roman cities were seen as cramped, filthy, disease-ridden places that bred soft, corrupt, and untrustworthy people. Hardly a civilisation to aspire to.

I think that intelligence/resourcefulness, the state of civilisation and the skill set of individuals are separate issues, which is a reason I voted no in the voice referendum. Surviving harsh Australian environments requires the first and last, but your civilisation can have almost no technical development, writing etc.

I remember listening to ph being attacked on the ABC when she first ran for the senate. No chance of winning and just after money from the electoral commission. Things haven't changed and inciting hatred remains a dumb strategy.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l_WBj5rDZj0