How about leaving a better future generation for society.
ttbn,
Precisely, however this can not be comprehended by the indoctrinated educated Woke as we witness here !

Indyvidual

While all of the nonsense continues, the latest polls show that the Albanese government is getting more popular: that if there was another election now, Labor would probably get even more seats.

Australians clearly approve of mass immigration and multiculturalism changing the country forever. They are more interested in handouts - bread and circuses like the Roman emperors provided to keep the disgruntled plebs quiet.

I have been accused of ‘blaming the victims’; but Australian voters are not victims: they are the instigators: Albanese is their creature: he wouldn't be there if they didn't want him. This ‘didn't get the primary vote’ is BS in our stupid system, which is too confusing and too much hard work, as it is meant to be, for the drones.

The bias towards Albanese's hard-core Socialism is said to be 60:40.

So, most Australians are getting what they want. The minority - that's us - just have to suck it up. We don't have to shut up, though; and who knows, the penny might drop before we are just like China - which is the sort of system that we are heading for.

The ridiculous preferential voting system was designed to keep the uniparty in power. Now that the other side of the uniparty has not been able to dislodge the most left-wing government ever (worse than even Whitlam), and then makes things worse by getting itself a real dud at the head of it (can't call her a leader), it looks like being permanently rooted. Australia is in a very bad place.

We have been described recently as pursuing the wet-left European model now, instead of the US one that we used to emulate. We are a joke, at the arse-end of the world, at the mercy of China, filling up with peasants who hate the West.

One commentator opines that Albanese's “recognition” of the non-existent state of Palestinian (a suck up to his Muslim/Arab imports) “breaches the social contract”. It fractures the delicate contract that binds Australian society. ‘Delicate’ because of the immigration of inappropriate people.

Albanese has recognised terrorists and ignored Australian citizens, of whom a minority support the “recognition” before peace is attained.

More splitting of society so favoured by dictators.

Not to mention the big win for Hama terrorists who have congratulated Albanese.

The commentator calls the move a “move towards terrorism”. I don't know about that, but we now know that the thought is out there. That it is an “ideological overreach” is a given. Virtue signalling over the common good. A fracturing of the social contract for “fleeting applause” from other leftist, decaying countries and from traditional enemies and terrorists.